Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29927634›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018

Detection of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection: Non-contrast liver MR imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging versus gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging.

Ji Hye Min, Young Kon Kim, Seo-Youn Choi, Tae Wook Kang, Woo Kyoung Jeong, Kyunga Kim, Ho-Jeong Won

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Consensus report from the 9European radiology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ji Hye Min1 Department of Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine , Daejeon , Korea.
Young Kon Kim2 Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine , Seoul , Republic of Korea.
Seo-Youn Choi3 Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital , Bucheon , Republic of Korea.
Tae Wook Kang2 Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine , Seoul , Republic of Korea.
Woo Kyoung Jeong2 Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine , Seoul , Republic of Korea.
Kyunga Kim4 Biostatics and Clinical Epidemiology Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center , Seoul , Republic of Korea.
Ho-Jeong Won4 Biostatics and Clinical Epidemiology Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center , Seoul , Republic of Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KRChungnam National University Hospital · KRSoonchunhyang University · KRSungkyunkwan University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of non-contrast liver MRI to whole MRI using gadoxetic acid for detection of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy.

methods: This retrospective study analyzed 483 patients who underwent surveillance with liver MRI after hepatectomy for HCC (median time interval, 7.7 months). Non-contrast MRI set (T

results: A total of 113 patients had 197 recurrent HCCs on first follow-up MRI. Although non-contrast MRI had fairly high sensitivity for recurrent HCC, there were significant differences in sensitivity (94.7% vs 99.1%, p = 0.025) and accuracy (97.5% vs 99.2%, p = 0.021) between the two image sets (per-patients base analysis). However, in patients followed for ≥1 year after surgery, the diagnostic performance of non-contrast MRI and whole MRI were not significantly different (p > 0.05).

conclusion: Non-contrast MRI may serve as an alternative follow-up method which can potentially replace whole MRI at least in selected patients followed up ≥1 year after surgery who have relatively lower risk of HCC recurrence. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: There is no consensus regarding the ideal imaging modality or follow-up interval after resection of HCC. Non-contrast MRI had comparable performance to that of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in the detection of HCC recurrence during surveillance ≥1 year after surgery.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, HepatocellularContrast MediaCost SavingsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGadolinium DTPAHepatectomyHumansLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA

Identifiers

PMID29927634
PMCPMC6350484
OpenAlexW2809018965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.