Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29927632›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2018

Peripheral vision: abdominal pathology missed outside the centre of gaze.

Catalin Vasile Ivan, Joseph H Mullineux, Vikas Shah, Ratan Verma, Arumugam Rajesh, James A Stephenson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catalin Vasile Ivan1 Department of Radiology, Gastrointestinal Imaging Group, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital , Leicester , UK.
Joseph H Mullineux1 Department of Radiology, Gastrointestinal Imaging Group, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital , Leicester , UK.
Vikas Shah1 Department of Radiology, Gastrointestinal Imaging Group, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital , Leicester , UK.
Ratan Verma1 Department of Radiology, Gastrointestinal Imaging Group, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital , Leicester , UK.
Arumugam Rajesh1 Department of Radiology, Gastrointestinal Imaging Group, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital , Leicester , UK.
James A Stephenson1 Department of Radiology, Gastrointestinal Imaging Group, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital , Leicester , UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiology misses have been the subject of much debate on both sides of the Atlantic in recent years. There is now greater focus in trying to reduce radiology errors by continuous education and changing the working environment to try and protect the radiologist, and ultimately the patient from potential harm. Duty of candour is a relevant and sensitive area. Developing robust validated reporting pathways within the healthcare structure is very important so as to encourage a "learning from discrepancies" culture and to put the patient and their families at the center of reporting and acknowledging errors in radiology. Having reflected in our daily practice and while writing this pictorial review, we have concluded that during reporting MRI scans, routine assessment of the localizer images, focusing outside the area of interest and having a more structured approach to image interrogation are key actions which may help reduce the number of omissions. We present a myriad of cases where pathology was "missed" outside the center of gaze in relation to the abdomen or outside the abdomen on abdominal MRI, and suggest key high yield sequence related review areas to minimize the chance of missing potentially significant pathology.

Indexed as

Abdominal NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsDelayed DiagnosisFemaleHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsKidney NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingOvarian NeoplasmsRetroperitoneal NeoplasmsSpinal NeoplasmsStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29927632
PMCPMC6475938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.