Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29927010›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer care2018

Treatment patterns and health care resource use in patients receiving multiple lines of therapy for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in the United Kingdom.

Elizabeth M La, Emily Nash Smyth, Sandra E Talbird, Li Li, James A Kaye, Aimee Bence Lin, Lee Bowman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth M LaDepartment of Health Economics, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5652-8961
Emily Nash SmythOncology, Global Patient Outcomes and Real World Evidence, Lilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
Sandra E TalbirdDepartment of Health Economics, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Li LiReal World Analytics, Oncology, Lilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
James A KayeDepartment of Epidemiology, RTI Health Solutions, Waltham, MA.
Aimee Bence LinEarly Phase Medical, Oncology, Lilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
Lee BowmanOncology, Global Patient Outcomes and Real World Evidence, Lilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USRTI Health Solutions · US

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the patterns of care and health care resource use (HCRU) in patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who received ≥3 lines of systemic therapy in the United Kingdom (UK). Oncologists (n = 40) abstracted medical records for patients with metastatic SCCHN who initiated third-line systemic therapy during 1 January 2011-30 August 2014 (n = 220). Patient characteristics, treatment patterns and SCCHN-related HCRU were summarised descriptively for the metastatic period; exploratory multivariable regression analyses were conducted on select HCRU outcomes. At metastatic diagnosis, most patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0/1 (95%). For patients with PS 0/1, the most common first-line treatment was cisplatin+5-fluorouracil (5-FU); docetaxel was the most common second- and third-line treatment. For patients with PS ≥ 2, the most common first-, second-, and third-line treatments were carboplatin+5-FU, cetuximab, and methotrexate, respectively. Most patients received supportive care during (85%) and after (89%) therapy. This study provides useful information, prior to the availability of immunotherapy, on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HCRU, and survival in a real-world UK population with metastatic SCCHN receiving ≥3 lines of systemic therapy. Patterns of care and HCRU varied among patients with metastatic SCCHN; specific systemic therapies varied by patient PS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOncology Service, HospitalOutpatient Clinics, HospitalPalliative CareSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckUnited KingdomYoung AdultAntineoplastic Agentshealth care resource usesquamous cell carcinoma of the head and necktreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID29927010
PMCPMC6175088
OpenAlexW2809599198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.