Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29926826›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2018

The intra-neuroendoscopic technique: A new method for rapid removal of acute severe intraventricular hematoma.

Bo Du, Ai-Jun Shan, Yu-Juan Zhang, Jin Wang, Kai-Wen Peng, Xian-Liang Zhong, Yu-Ping Peng

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02515903 (Comparison Between Stereotactic Aspiration and Intra-endoscopic Surgery to Treat Intracerebral Hemorrhage), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02515903 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparison Between Stereotactic Aspiration and Intra-endoscopic Surgery to Treat Intracerebral Hemorrhage

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityRan2015 to 2016Enrolled100ConditionsIntracerebral Hemorrhage, SurgeryArmsIntra-endoscopic surgery, Placebo:stereotactic aspiration surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bo DuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou; Department of Emergency Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Ai-Jun ShanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Yu-Juan ZhangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Jin WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Kai-Wen PengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Xian-Liang ZhongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Yu-Ping PengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Jinan University · CNNanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mortality rate of acute severe intraventricular hematoma is extremely high, and the rate of disability in survivors is high. Intraventricular hematoma has always been a difficult problem for clinical treatment. Although minimally invasive endoscopic hematoma evacuation is widely used to treat this disease, the technique still has room for improvement. Equipment for the intra-neuroendoscopic technique (INET) consists of two of our patented inventions: a transparent sheath (Patent No. ZL 200820046232.0) and a hematoma aspirator (Patent No. ZL 201520248717.8). This study explored the safety and efficacy of INET by comparing it with extraventricular drainage in combination with urokinase thrombolytic therapy. This trial recruited 65 patients with severe intraventricular hemorrhage, including 35 (19 men and 16 women, aged 53.2 ± 8.7 years) in the INET group and 30 (17 men and 13 women, aged 51.5 ± 7.9 years) in the control group (extraventricular drainage plus urokinase thrombolytic therapy). Our results showed that compared with the control group, the INET group exhibited lower intraventricular hemorrhage volumes, shorter intensive care-unit monitoring and ventricular drainage-tube placement times, and fewer incidences of intracranial infection, secondary bleeding, and mortality. Thus, the prognosis of survivors had improved remarkably. These findings indicate that INET is a safe and efficient new method for treating severe intraventricular hematoma. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02515903).

Indexed as

extraventricular drainageintra-neuroendoscopic techniqueminimally invasive surgerynerve regenerationneural regenerationprognosistransparent sheathurokinase thrombolysisventricular hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID29926826
PMCPMC6022483
OpenAlexW2809315434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.