Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29926377›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2019

Role of Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Sulfide in Ischemic Stroke and the Emergent Epigenetic Underpinnings.

Parimala Narne, Vimal Pandey, Prakash Babu Phanithi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Recent Advances in Molecular Research on Hydrogen Sulfide (HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Research progress of absorbable stents.International journal of medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Role of NADCellular and molecular neurobiology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Parimala NarneDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India.
Vimal PandeyDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India.
Prakash Babu PhanithiDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India. prakash@uohyd.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4634-9967
University of Hyderabad · IN

Funding

Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology (BT/PR18168/MED/29/1064/2016Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology D.O. No. SR/CSRI/196/2016Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology SR/WOS-A/LS-1035/2014(G)University Grants Commission No.F.4-2/2006 (BSR)/BL/13-14/0168University Grants Commission UH/UGC/UPE-2/Interface studies/ Research Projects/B1.4; UH/UPE-2/28/2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen sulfide (H

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain IschemiaEpigenesis, GeneticHomeostasisHumansHydrogen SulfideNitric OxideSignal TransductionStrokeHydrogen SulfideNitric OxideEpigeneticHydrogen sulfideIschemic strokeNitric oxideS-nitrosylationS-sulfhydration

Identifiers

PMID29926377
OpenAlexW2809678941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.