Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29926334›Full record

ArticleDemography2018

Extension, Compression, and Beyond: A Unique Classification System for Mortality Evolution Patterns.

Matthias Börger, Martin Genz, Jochen Ruß

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Demography, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthias BörgerInstitut für Finanz- und Aktuarwissenschaften (ifa), Lise-Meitner-Straße 14, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Martin GenzInstitut für Finanz- und Aktuarwissenschaften (ifa), Lise-Meitner-Straße 14, 89081, Ulm, Germany. m.genz@ifa-ulm.de.
Jochen RußInstitut für Finanz- und Aktuarwissenschaften (ifa), Lise-Meitner-Straße 14, 89081, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of literature addresses the question of how the age distribution of deaths changes over time as life expectancy increases. However, corresponding terms such as extension, compression, or rectangularization are sometimes defined only vaguely, and statistics used to detect certain scenarios can be misleading. The matter is further complicated because mixed scenarios can prevail, and the considered age range can have an impact on observed mortality patterns. In this article, we establish a unique classification framework for realized mortality scenarios that allows for the detection of both pure and mixed scenarios. Our framework determines whether changes of the deaths curve over time show elements of extension or contraction; compression or decompression; left- or right-shifting mortality; and concentration or diffusion. The framework not only can test the presence of a particular scenario but also can assign a unique scenario to any observed mortality evolution. Furthermore, it can detect different mortality scenarios for different age ranges in the same population. We also present a methodology for the implementation of our classification framework and apply it to mortality data for U.S. females.

Indexed as

Research DesignAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionCause of DeathChildChild, PreschoolData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLife ExpectancyLongevityCompressionExtensionMortality scenario classificationRectangularizationShifting mortality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.