Observational studyUpdates in surgery2018
Stage III esophageal adenocarcinoma: definitive chemoradiation vs. chemoradiation plus surgery.
Observational study in Updates in surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: the choice of treatment modality.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
- Trimodality Therapy vs Definitive Chemoradiation in Older Adults With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimal management of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer remains under debate. We aimed to compare the long-term survival outcomes between definitive chemoradiation (dCR) and chemoradiation plus surgery (CRS) in patients with stage III esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Using the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registry, adults (≥ 18 years old) with diagnosis of AJCC 6th edition stage III EAC (T3/N1, T4/N0, and T4/N1) between 2004 and 2014 were included. A multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the effect of dCR and CRS on mortality. Of the 2633 patients included, 1115 (42%) underwent Dcr, and 1518 (58%) underwent CRS. The 5-year survival rate was 13% for patients undergoing dCR and 27% for patients undergoing CRS (p < 0.0001). Our observational data suggest that patients with stage III EAC may benefit by the use of esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29926306What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.