Observational studyInternational journal of colorectal disease2018
A new dimensional-reducing variable obtained from original inflammatory scores is highly associated to morbidity after curative surgery for colorectal cancer.
Observational study in International journal of colorectal disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Diverting Stoma Creation in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2025Article
- Predictive factors associated with anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer: a multicenter study with the Hiroshima Surgical study group of Clinical Oncology.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Preoperative Immunocite-Derived Ratios Predict Surgical Complications Better when Artificial Neural Networks Are Used for Analysis-A Pilot Comparative Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Higher modified Glasgow Prognostic Score and multiple stapler firings for rectal transection are risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection in rectal cancer.Fukushima journal of medical science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSeveral scores have been developed to define the inflammatory status of oncological patients. We suspect they share iterative information. Our hypothesis is that we may summarise their information into one or two new variables which will be independent. This will help us to predict, more accurately, which patients are at an increased risk of suffering postoperative complications after curative surgery for CRC.
methodsObservational prospective study with those patients undergoing curative surgery for CRC between September 2015 and February 2017. We analysed the influence of inflammatory scores (PNI, GPS, NLR, PLR) on postoperative morbidity (overall and severe complications, anastomotic leakage and reoperation).
resultsFinally, 168 patients were analysed. We checked these four original scores are interrelated among them. Using a complex and innovative statistical method, we created two new independent variables (resultant A and resultant B) which resume the information coming from them. One of these two new variables (resultant A) was statistically associated to overall complications (OR, 2.239; 95% CI, 1.541-3.253; p = 0.0001), severe complications (OR, 1.773; 95% CI, 1.129-2.785; p = 0.013), anastomotic leakage (OR, 3.208; 95% CI, 1.416-7.268; p = 0.005) and reoperation (OR, 2.349; 95% CI, 1.281-4.305; p = 0.006).
conclusionsWe evinced the four original scores we used share redundant information. We created two new independent new variables which resume their information. In our sample of patients, one of these variables turned out to be a great predictive factor for the four complications we analysed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29926232What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.