Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29926166›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

Laparoscopic management of incidental gallbladder cancer.

Xabier de Aretxabala, Federico Oppliger, Nicolas Solano, Guillermo Rencoret, Marcelo Vivanco, Daniel Carvajal, Juan Hepp, Ivan Roa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Understanding the Scientific Cooperation in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: from a Bibliometric Perspective.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xabier de AretxabalaDepartment of Surgery, Clinica Alemana, Vitacura, 5951, Santiago, Chile. xdearetxabala@alemana.cl.ORCID 0000-0002-2158-539X
Federico OppligerDepartment of Surgery, Clinica Alemana, Vitacura, 5951, Santiago, Chile.
Nicolas SolanoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital of Quilpue Chile, Quilpué, Chile.
Guillermo RencoretDepartment of Surgery, Clinica Alemana, Vitacura, 5951, Santiago, Chile.
Marcelo VivancoDepartment of Surgery, Clinica Alemana, Vitacura, 5951, Santiago, Chile.
Daniel CarvajalPathology Unit, Clinica Alemana, Santiago, Chile.
Juan HeppDepartment of Surgery, Clinica Alemana, Vitacura, 5951, Santiago, Chile.
Ivan RoaCreative Bio-Science, Santiago, Chile.
Clínica Alemana · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe laparoscopic cholecystectomy has allowed the detection of an increasing number of incidental gallbladder cancers (IGBC). Although laparoscopy is employed in the management of a variety of abdominal tumors, its use in gallbladder cancer is reduced and controversial. This study analyzes the role of laparoscopy in gallbladder cancer with the focus in IGBC.

methodWe evaluated our prospective series of 51 patients with an IGBC who were treated by laparoscopy between 2006 and 2016 at the Clinica Alemana in Santiago, Chile.

resultsThe series comprised 7 men and 44 women. Age ranged from 43 to 76 years (mean age 60). Regarding wall involvement, 29 patients had a T2 tumor, which was the most common. 8 and 14 patients had T1b and T3 tumors, respectively. Of the patients, 17 underwent only laparoscopic exploration. This was due to the presence tumor dissemination not being observed in the preoperative staging. 10 patients had to be converted to complete the resection, whereas 24 patients were laparoscopically resected. The quality of the resected material was not different between those who were converted and those who were treated by laparoscopy. In the laparoscopic group, the average number of harvested lymph nodes was 7.9, not statistically different from the converted group. The mean of hospital stay in the laparoscopic group (4.3 days) was significantly lower than the converted group.

conclusionsLaparoscopy has been shown to be a safe and feasible method for the management of IGBC. This method not only allows for a complete exploration, identifying a previously unseen residual tumor, but also makes it possible to accomplish the same oncology objectives as the open procedure. Therefore, laparoscopy should be considered a valid alternative in the management of IGBC.

Indexed as

Incidental FindingsLaparoscopyAdultAgedCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicFemaleGallbladder NeoplasmsHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesGallbladder cancerIncidental tumorLaparoscopic resectionLymphadenectomy

Identifiers

PMID29926166
OpenAlexW2809141709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.