Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29926135›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2018

Urgent need to modernize pharmacovigilance education in healthcare curricula: review of the literature.

Michael Reumerman, J Tichelaar, B Piersma, M C Richir, M A van Agtmael

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael ReumermanPharmacotherapy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.reumerman@vumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9060-0701
J TichelaarPharmacotherapy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
B PiersmaPharmacotherapy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M C RichirPharmacotherapy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M A van AgtmaelPharmacotherapy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPharmacovigilance education is essential since adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a serious health problem and contribute to unnecessary patient burden and hospital admissions. Healthcare professionals have little awareness of pharmacovigilance and ADR reporting, and only few educational interventions had durable effects on this awareness. Our future healthcare providers should therefore acquire an adequate set of pharmacovigilance competencies to rationally prescribe, distribute, and monitor drugs. We investigated the pharmacovigilance and ADR-reporting competencies of healthcare students to identify educational interventions that are effective in promoting pharmacovigilance.

methodsThe PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ERIC databases were searched using the terms "pharmacovigilance," "students," and "education.".

resultsTwenty-five cross-sectional and 14 intervention studies describing mostly medical and pharmacy students were included. Intentions and attitudes on ADR reporting were overall positive, although most students felt inadequately prepared, missed the training on this topic, and lacked basic knowledge. Although nearly all students observed ADRs during clinical rounds, only a few had actually been involved in reporting an ADR. Educational interventions were predominately lectures, sometimes accompanied by small interactive working groups. Most interventions resulted in a direct increase in knowledge with an unknown long-term effect. Real-life learning initiatives have shown that healthcare students are capable of contributing to patient care while increasing their ADR-reporting skills and knowledge.

conclusionsThere is an urgent need to improve and innovate current pharmacovigilance education for undergraduate healthcare students. By offering real-life pharmacovigilance training, students will increase their knowledge and awareness but can also assist current healthcare professionals to meet their pharmacovigilance obligations.

Indexed as

PharmacovigilanceAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsClinical CompetenceCompetency-Based EducationCurriculumDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansStudents, Health OccupationsMedical educationPharmacotherapyPharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID29926135
PMCPMC6132536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.