Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29926086›Full record

ArticleJAMA psychiatry2018

Assessment of Neurocognitive Functions in 7-Year-Old Children at Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder: The Danish High Risk and Resilience Study VIA 7.

Nicoline Hemager, Kerstin J Plessen, Anne Thorup, Camilla Christiani, Ditte Ellersgaard, Katrine Søborg Spang, Birgitte Klee Burton, Maja Gregersen, Anne Søndergaard, Aja Neergaard Greve and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Schizophrenia treatment preferences of psychiatrists versus guidelines: A European perspective.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Nicoline HemagerMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen.
Kerstin J PlessenChild and Adolescent Mental Health Centre, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen.
Anne ThorupMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen.
Camilla ChristianiMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen.
Ditte EllersgaardMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen.
Katrine Søborg SpangChild and Adolescent Mental Health Centre, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen.
Birgitte Klee BurtonChild and Adolescent Mental Health Centre, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen.
Maja GregersenMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen.
Anne SøndergaardMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen.
Aja Neergaard GreveThe Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research (iPSYCH), Aarhus, Denmark.
Ditte Lou GantriisThe Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research (iPSYCH), Aarhus, Denmark.
Gry PoulsenThe Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research (iPSYCH), Aarhus, Denmark.
Larry J SeidmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ole MorsThe Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research (iPSYCH), Aarhus, Denmark.
Merete NordentoftMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen.
Jens Richardt Møllegaard JepsenMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Children at familial high risk of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (FHR-SZ) or bipolar disorder (FHR-BP) exhibit neurocognitive impairments. Large studies of neurocognition in young children at familial high risk at the same age are important to differentiate the pathophysiology and developmental trajectory of these 2 groups. Objective: To characterize neurocognitive functions in 7-year-old children with FHR-SZ or FHR-BP and a control population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multisite population-based cohort study collected data from January 1, 2013, to January 31, 2016, in the first wave of the Danish High Risk and Resilience Study VIA 7 at 2 university hospital research sites in Copenhagen and Aarhus using Danish registries. Participants (n = 514) included 197 children with FHR-SZ, 118 with FHR-BP, and 199 controls matched with the FHR-SZ group for age, sex, and municipality. Assessors were blinded to risk status. Exposures: Parents with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or neither diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Neurocognitive functions were measured across 23 tests. Four neurocognitive domains were derived by principal component analysis, including processing speed and working memory, verbal functions, executive and visuospatial functions, and declarative memory and attention. Results: A total of 514 children aged 7 years were included in the analysis (46.3% girls), consisting of 197 children with FHR-SZ (46.2% girls), 118 with FHR-BP (46.6% girls), and 199 controls (46.2% girls). Children with FHR-SZ were significantly impaired compared with controls on processing speed and working memory (Cohen d = 0.50; P < .001), executive and visuospatial functions (Cohen d = 0.28; P = .03), and declarative memory and attention (Cohen d = 0.29; P = .02). Compared with children with FHR-BP, children with FHR-SZ performed significantly poorer in processing speed and working memory (Cohen d = 0.40; P = .002), executive and visuospatial functions (Cohen d = 0.35; P = .008), and declarative memory and attention (Cohen d = 0.31; P = .03). Children with FHR-BP and controls did not differ. Conclusions and Relevance: Children with FHR-SZ had widespread neurocognitive impairments, supporting the hypothesis of neurocognitive functions as endophenotypes of schizophrenia. The absence of neurocognitive deficits in children with FHR-BP suggests distinct neurodevelopmental manifestations in these familial high-risk groups at this age. Early detection of children with FHR-SZ and cognitive impairments is warranted to investigate associations of neurocognition with transition to psychosis, add to the knowledge of their developmental pathophysiology, and inform early intervention programs.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderMental Status and Dementia TestsNeurocognitive DisordersSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyChildDenmarkEarly DiagnosisEarly Medical InterventionEndophenotypesExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMedical History TakingMental Competency

Identifiers

PMID29926086
PMCPMC6143091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.