Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29925889›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2018

Causal role of the inferolateral prefrontal cortex in balancing goal-directed and habitual control of behavior.

Mario Bogdanov, Jan E Timmermann, Jan Gläscher, Friedhelm C Hummel, Lars Schwabe

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reinforcement-learning in fronto-striatal circuits.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Brain networks underlying vulnerability and resilience to drug addiction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mario BogdanovDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Institute for Psychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Jan E TimmermannDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4974-4580
Jan GläscherInstitute for Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1020-7115
Friedhelm C HummelDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Lars SchwabeDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Institute for Psychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. Lars.Schwabe@uni-hamburg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4429-4373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful adaptation to complex environments depends on the balance of at least two systems: a flexible but slow goal-directed system encoding action-outcome associations and an efficient but rigid habitual system linking responses to preceding stimuli. Recent evidence suggests that the inferolateral prefrontal cortex (ilPFC), a region well known to contribute to cognitive control processes, may play a crucial role in the balance of goal-directed and habitual responding. This evidence, however, comes mainly from correlational data and whether the ilPFC is indeed causally involved in the goal-directed vs. habitual control of behavior is unclear. Here, we used neuro-navigated theta-burst stimulation (TBS) to either inhibit or enhance right ilPFC functionality before participants completed an instrumental learning task designed to probe goal-directed vs. habitual behavioral control. TBS did not affect overall learning performance. However, participants that had received inhibitory TBS were less able to adapt their behavior to altered task demands, indicating a shift from goal-directed towards more habitual control of behavior. Sham or excitatory TMS groups showed no such effect and were comparable in their performance to an unstimulated control group. Our findings indicate a causal role of the ilPFC in the balance of goal-directed vs. habitual control of behavior.

Indexed as

AdultConditioning, OperantDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29925889
PMCPMC6010441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.