Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29925876›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Genome-Wide Survey and Comparative Analysis of Long Terminal Repeat (LTR) Retrotransposon Families in Four Gossypium Species.

Zhen Liu, Yuling Liu, Fang Liu, Shulin Zhang, Xingxing Wang, Quanwei Lu, Kunbo Wang, Baohong Zhang, Renhai Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The nature and organization of satellite DNAs inFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular and Cytogenetic Analysis of rDNA Evolution in Crepis Sensu Lato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhen LiuAnyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Yuling LiuAnyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Fang LiuState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology/Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Shulin ZhangAnyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Xingxing WangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology/Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Quanwei LuAnyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Kunbo WangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology/Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Baohong ZhangDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA. zhangb@ecu.edu.
Renhai PengAnyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China. aydxprh@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposon is the most abundant DNA component and is largely responsible for plant genome size variation. Although it has been studied in plant species, very limited data is available for cotton, the most important fiber and texture crop. In this study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of LTR retrotransposon families across four cotton species. In tetraploid Gossypium species, LTR retrotransposon families from the progenitor D genome had more copies in D-subgenome, and families from the progenitor A genome had more copies in A-subgenome. Some LTR retrotransposon families that insert after polyploid formation may still distribute the majority of its copies in one of the subgenomes. The data also shows that families of 10~200 copies are abundant and they have a great influence on the Gossypium genome size; on the contrary, a small number of high copy LTR retrotransposon families have less contribution to the genome size. Kimura distance distribution indicates that high copy number family is not a recent outbreak, and there is no obvious relationship between family copy number and the period of evolution. Further analysis reveals that each LTR retrotransposon family may have their own distribution characteristics in cotton.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantEvolution, MolecularGene DosageGenome, PlantGossypiumPhylogenyRetroelementsTerminal Repeat SequencesRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID29925876
PMCPMC6010443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.