ArticleScientific reports2018
Three-photon tissue imaging using moxifloxacin.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vivo Microendoscopy in the Near-Infrared II Window.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Two- and Three-Photon Deep Imaging of Autofluorescence in Bacterial Communities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Optical Methods for Non-Invasive Determination of Skin Penetration: Current Trends, Advances, Possibilities, Prospects, and Translation into In Vivo Human Studies.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Clinically Compatible Fluorescence Microscopy Based on Moxifloxacin Antibiotic.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Moxifloxacin based fluorescence imaging of intestinal goblet cells.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- High-speed combined reflectance confocal and moxifloxacin based two-photon microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- In vivo fluorescence imaging of conjunctival goblet cells.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Moxifloxacin is an antibiotic used in clinics and has recently been used as a clinically compatible cell-labeling agent for two-photon (2P) imaging. Although 2P imaging with moxifloxacin labeling visualized cells inside tissues using enhanced fluorescence, the imaging depth was quite limited because of the relatively short excitation wavelength (<800 nm) used. In this study, the feasibility of three-photon (3P) excitation of moxifloxacin using a longer excitation wavelength and moxifloxacin-based 3P imaging were tested to increase the imaging depth. Moxifloxacin fluorescence via 3P excitation was detected at a >1000 nm excitation wavelength. After obtaining the excitation and emission spectra of moxifloxacin, moxifloxacin-based 3P imaging was applied to ex vivo mouse bladder and ex vivo mouse small intestine tissues and compared with moxifloxacin-based 2P imaging by switching the excitation wavelength of a Ti:sapphire oscillator between near 1030 and 780 nm. Both moxifloxacin-based 2P and 3P imaging visualized cellular structures in the tissues via moxifloxacin labeling, but the image contrast was better with 3P imaging than with 2P imaging at the same imaging depths. The imaging speed and imaging depth of moxifloxacin-based 3P imaging using a Ti:sapphire oscillator were limited by insufficient excitation power. Therefore, we constructed a new system for moxifloxacin-based 3P imaging using a high-energy Yb fiber laser at 1030 nm and used it for in vivo deep tissue imaging of a mouse small intestine. Moxifloxacin-based 3P imaging could be useful for clinical applications with enhanced imaging depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.