Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29925821›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Rho GTPases in Intellectual Disability: From Genetics to Therapeutic Opportunities.

Valentina Zamboni, Rebecca Jones, Alessandro Umbach, Alessandra Ammoni, Maria Passafaro, Emilio Hirsch, Giorgio R Merlo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Valentina ZamboniDepartment Molecular Biotechnology and Health Science, University of Torino, Via Nizza 52, 10126 Turin, Italy. valentina.zamboni@unito.it.
Rebecca JonesDepartment Molecular Biotechnology and Health Science, University of Torino, Via Nizza 52, 10126 Turin, Italy. rebecca.jones@edu.unito.it.
Alessandro UmbachDepartment Molecular Biotechnology and Health Science, University of Torino, Via Nizza 52, 10126 Turin, Italy. alessandro.umbach@edu.unito.it.
Alessandra AmmoniDepartment Molecular Biotechnology and Health Science, University of Torino, Via Nizza 52, 10126 Turin, Italy. alessandra.ammoni@edu.unito.it.
Maria PassafaroNational Research Council (CNR) Institute for Neuroscience, Via Luigi Vanvitelli, 32, I-20129 Milan, Italy. m.passafaro@in.cnr.it.
Emilio HirschDepartment Molecular Biotechnology and Health Science, University of Torino, Via Nizza 52, 10126 Turin, Italy. emilio.hirsch@unito.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9073-6024
Giorgio R MerloDepartment Molecular Biotechnology and Health Science, University of Torino, Via Nizza 52, 10126 Turin, Italy. giorgioroberto.merlo@unito.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rho-class small GTPases are implicated in basic cellular processes at nearly all brain developmental steps, from neurogenesis and migration to axon guidance and synaptic plasticity. GTPases are key signal transducing enzymes that link extracellular cues to the neuronal responses required for the construction of neuronal networks, as well as for synaptic function and plasticity. Rho GTPases are highly regulated by a complex set of activating (GEFs) and inactivating (GAPs) partners, via protein:protein interactions (PPI). Misregulated RhoA, Rac1/Rac3 and cdc42 activity has been linked with intellectual disability (ID) and other neurodevelopmental conditions that comprise ID. All genetic evidences indicate that in these disorders the RhoA pathway is hyperactive while the Rac1 and cdc42 pathways are consistently hypoactive. Adopting cultured neurons for in vitro testing and specific animal models of ID for in vivo examination, the endophenotypes associated with these conditions are emerging and include altered neuronal networking, unbalanced excitation/inhibition and altered synaptic activity and plasticity. As we approach a clearer definition of these phenotype(s) and the role of hyper- and hypo-active GTPases in the construction of neuronal networks, there is an increasing possibility that selective inhibitors and activators might be designed via PPI, or identified by screening, that counteract the misregulation of small GTPases and result in alleviation of the cognitive condition. Here we review all knowledge in support of this possibility.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnzyme InhibitorsGTPase-Activating ProteinsGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHumansIntellectual DisabilityMiceModels, AnimalNeurogenesisNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsRatsrho GTP-Binding ProteinsEnzyme InhibitorsGTPase-Activating ProteinsGuanine Nucleotide Exchange Factorsrho GTP-Binding Proteinscdc42GTPase pathwayintellectual disabilityneuronal networksRac1RhoA

Identifiers

PMID29925821
PMCPMC6032284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.