Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29925699›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2018

Cytoplasmic volume of recipient oocytes affects the nucleus reprogramming and the developmental competence of HMC buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos.

Xiaohua Liu, Chan Luo, Kai Deng, Zhulian Wu, Yingming Wei, Jianrong Jiang, Fenghua Lu, Deshun Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. SCNT and genome editing in Buffalo, the black gold of the tropics.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaohua LiuGuangxi High Education Key Laboratory for Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.
Chan LuoGuangxi High Education Key Laboratory for Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.
Kai DengGuangxi High Education Key Laboratory for Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.
Zhulian WuGuangxi High Education Key Laboratory for Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.
Yingming WeiGuangxi High Education Key Laboratory for Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.
Jianrong JiangGuangxi High Education Key Laboratory for Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.
Fenghua LuGuangxi High Education Key Laboratory for Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.
Deshun ShiGuangxi High Education Key Laboratory for Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to examine the effects of cytoplasmic volume on nucleus reprogramming and developmental competence of buffalo handmade cloning (HMC) embryos. We found that both HMC embryos derived from ~150% cytoplasm or ~225% cytoplasm resulted in a higher blastocyst rate and total cell number of blastocyst in comparison with those from ~75% cytoplasm (25.4 ± 2.0, 27.9 ± 1.6% vs. 17.9 ± 3.1%; 150 ± 10, 169 ± 12 vs. 85 ± 6, P<0.05). Meanwhile, the proportions of nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD) and premature chromosome condensation (PCC) were also increased in the embryos derived from ~150 or ~225% enucleated cytoplasm compared to those from ~75% cytoplasm. Moreover, HMC embryos derived from ~225% cytoplasm showed a decrease of global DNA methylation from the 2-cell to the 4-cell stage in comparison with those of ~75% cytoplasm (P<0.05). Furthermore, the expression of embryonic genome activation (EGA) relative genes (eIF1A and U2AF) in HMC embryos derived from ~225% cytoplasm at the 8-cell stages was also found to be enhanced compared with that of the ~75% cytoplasm. Two of seven recipients were confirmed to be pregnant following transfer of blastocysts derived from ~225% cytoplasm, and one healthy cloned calf was delivered at the end of the gestation period, whereas no recipients were pregnant after the transfer of blastocysts derived from ~75% cytoplasm. These results indicate that the cytoplasmic volume of recipient oocytes affects donor nucleus reprogramming, and then further accounted for the developmental ability of the reconstructed embryos.

Indexed as

BuffaloesCloning, OrganismAnimalsBlastocystEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleFibroblastsNuclear Transfer TechniquesOocytesPregnancybuffalocytoplasmic volumeembryo developmental competencehandmade cloning

Identifiers

PMID29925699
PMCPMC6115262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.