Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29925698›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2018

Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of microorganisms isolated from severe corneal ulcers of dogs in Thailand.

Daneeya Ekapopphan, Athicha Srisutthakarn, Walasinee Moonarmart, Ruangrat Buddhirongawatr, Norasuthi Bangphoomi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Commercially available antiseptics show highFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Case Report: The First Report onFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daneeya EkapopphanDepartment of Pre-clinic and Applied Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonton 4, Salaya, Phuttamonton, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
Athicha SrisutthakarnDepartment of Pre-clinic and Applied Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonton 4, Salaya, Phuttamonton, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
Walasinee MoonarmartDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonton 4, Salaya, Phuttamonton, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
Ruangrat BuddhirongawatrDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonton 4, Salaya, Phuttamonton, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
Norasuthi BangphoomiDepartment of Pre-clinic and Applied Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonton 4, Salaya, Phuttamonton, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
Mahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to determine the microbiological profile and risk factors associated with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in canine severe corneal ulcers. Thirty-two corneal and conjunctival swabs were collected from dogs with diagnosed severe corneal ulcers that presented to Prasu-Arthorn veterinary teaching hospital in Nakhon Pathom, Thailand from June 2015 to June 2016. Microorganisms were identified by means of genotypic and phenotypic approaches. Of 32 ulcers sampled, 26 (81.3%) yielded culturable microorganisms with 24 bacterial isolates and 7 fungal isolates. The most commonly isolated bacteria were Staphylococcus spp. (45.8%, 11/24) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20.8%, 5/24). Out of 11 staphylococcal isolates identified, 10 carried the mecA gene providing methicillin resistance. The extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) encoding genes bla

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaColony Count, MicrobialCorneal UlcerDog DiseasesDogsDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Resistance, FungalFemaleFungiMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsThailandAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial susceptibilitycanine severe corneal ulcerophthalmic antibioticrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID29925698
PMCPMC6115253
OpenAlexW2809496708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.