ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2018
A Flowthrough Assay for Rapid Bedside Stratification of Bloodstream Bacterial Infection in Critically Ill Patients: a Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sodium Butyrate More Effectively Mitigates the Negative Effects of High-Concentrate Diet in Dairy Cows than SodiumToxins · 2021Article
- A Single StepFrontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- Quantification of Lipoteichoic Acid in Hemodialysis Patients With Central Venous Catheters.Frontiers in medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial infections affect more than 2 million people annually. Of these, systemic infections caused by bacteria in critically ill patients may lead to life-threatening conditions such as sepsis. We have developed a point-of-care (POC) device called Septiflo that can detect and stratify the Gram status of bloodstream bacterial infections in less than 10 min from a drop of human plasma. It works on the principle of identifying pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and lipoteichoic acid (LTA) that are released into the bloodstream at the onset of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial infections, respectively. The biomarkers are captured on a membrane without a receptor, and the Gram status specificity is conferred by the ligands attached to gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) used as signal amplification probes. The ultrasensitive colorimetric results are read by eye down to a 100-fg/ml detection limit without an instrument. No cross-interference between the PAMPs is seen during Gram stratification. Septiflo results also display better performance than commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Tests performed on 60 clinical samples from patients showed a correlation accuracy of 70% against procalcitonin (PCT), an accepted surrogate biomarker for sepsis. A direct comparison with eubacterial PCR yielded up to 94% accuracy in 31 patients at a chosen cutoff level for LPS and LTA and area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.927 and 0.885, respectively, though blood culture was negative for most samples. The high sensitivity, low cost, and simple bedside utility of the assay may aid in better sepsis management apparently at the presymptomatic stage, lowering empirical therapy, medical costs, antimicrobial resistance, and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.