Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29925596›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Indel-correcting DNA barcodes for high-throughput sequencing.

John A Hawkins, Stephen K Jones, Ilya J Finkelstein, William H Press

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The diverse functions of viral microproteins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A set of genetic tools for use inMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Scaling perturbations: beyond genome-scale CRISPR screens.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Self-documenting plasmids.Trends in biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John A HawkinsInstitute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Stephen K JonesDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Ilya J FinkelsteinDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; ifinkelstein@cm.utexas.edu wpress@cs.utexas.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9371-2431
William H PressInstitute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; ifinkelstein@cm.utexas.edu wpress@cs.utexas.edu.

Funding

Mechanistic Characterization of the First Steps of Human DNA Break RepairR01GM120554 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI FINKELSTEIN, ILYA J · 2016 to 2020
$1.5M
Mechanism, specificity, and design of CRISPR RNA-mediated gene regulationR01GM124141 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI FINKELSTEIN, ILYA J · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
High-throughput analysis of mitochondrial renewal and oxidative stress in cellular lifespan and quiescence of Schizosaccharomyces pombeF32AG053051 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI JONES, STEPHEN KNOX · 2016 to 2018
$174k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG053051NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120554NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many large-scale, high-throughput experiments use DNA barcodes, short DNA sequences prepended to DNA libraries, for identification of individuals in pooled biomolecule populations. However, DNA synthesis and sequencing errors confound the correct interpretation of observed barcodes and can lead to significant data loss or spurious results. Widely used error-correcting codes borrowed from computer science (e.g., Hamming, Levenshtein codes) do not properly account for insertions and deletions (indels) in DNA barcodes, even though deletions are the most common type of synthesis error. Here, we present and experimentally validate filled/truncated right end edit (FREE) barcodes, which correct substitution, insertion, and deletion errors, even when these errors alter the barcode length. FREE barcodes are designed with experimental considerations in mind, including balanced guanine-cytosine (GC) content, minimal homopolymer runs, and reduced internal hairpin propensity. We generate and include lists of barcodes with different lengths and error correction levels that may be useful in diverse high-throughput applications, including >10

Indexed as

Base SequenceDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingINDEL MutationDNA barcodeserror-correcting codesinformation storagemassively parallel synthesis

Identifiers

PMID29925596
PMCPMC6142223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.