Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29925582›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2018

Contributions of metabolic and temporal costs to human gait selection.

Erik M Summerside, Rodger Kram, Alaa A Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A unified energy-optimality criterion predicts human navigation paths and speeds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dimensionality Reduction of Human Gait for Prosthetic Control.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erik M SummersideDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0401, USA erik.summerside@colorado.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4301-7489
Rodger KramDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0401, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2526-1608
Alaa A AhmedDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0401, USA.

Funding

Effort, reward and vigor in decision making and movement controlR01NS096083 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI AHMED, ALAA A. · 2017 to 2021
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS096083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans naturally select several parameters within a gait that correspond with minimizing metabolic cost. Much less is understood about the role of metabolic cost in selecting between gaits. Here, we asked participants to decide between walking or running out and back to different gait specific markers. The distance of the walking marker was adjusted after each decision to identify relative distances where individuals switched gait preferences. We found that neither minimizing solely metabolic energy nor minimizing solely movement time could predict how the group decided between gaits. Of our twenty participants, six behaved in a way that tended towards minimizing metabolic energy, while eight favoured strategies that tended more towards minimizing movement time. The remaining six participants could not be explained by minimizing a single cost. We provide evidence that humans consider not just a single movement cost, but instead a weighted combination of these conflicting costs with their relative contributions varying across participants. Individuals who placed a higher relative value on time ran faster than individuals who placed a higher relative value on metabolic energy. Sensitivity to temporal costs also explained variability in an individual's preferred velocity as a function of increasing running distance. Interestingly, these differences in velocity both within and across participants were absent in walking, possibly due to a steeper metabolic cost of transport curve. We conclude that metabolic cost plays an essential, but not exclusive role in gait decisions.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalEnergy MetabolismFemaleGaitHumansMaleWalkingdecision-makinggait selectionmetabolic minimizationruntemporal discountingwalk

Identifiers

PMID29925582
PMCPMC6030640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.