Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29925423›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2018

The developing premature infant gut microbiome is a major factor shaping the microbiome of neonatal intensive care unit rooms.

Brandon Brooks, Matthew R Olm, Brian A Firek, Robyn Baker, David Geller-McGrath, Sophia R Reimer, Karina R Soenjoyo, Jennifer S Yip, Dylan Dahan, Brian C Thomas and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The indoors microbiome and human health.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Influence of infant microbiome on health and development.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon BrooksDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3738-1383
Matthew R OlmDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Brian A FirekUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Robyn BakerDivision of Newborn Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
David Geller-McGrathDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Sophia R ReimerDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Karina R SoenjoyoDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Jennifer S YipDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Dylan DahanDepartment of Biology, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY, USA.
Brian C ThomasDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Michael J MorowitzUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jillian F BanfieldDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. jbanfield@berkeley.edu.
Planetary Science Institute · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USBard College · USChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Population Genomic Analysis of Gut Microbial Colonization in Premature InfantsR01AI092531 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Jillian Banfield, Michael Morowitz · 2011 to 2026
$11.3M
Pacific Biosciences PacBio RS Single Molecule Real Time SequencerS10OD018174 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ROKHSAR, DANIEL SOLEYMAN · 2014 to 2014
$600k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI092531NIH HHS S10 OD018174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) contains a unique cohort of patients with underdeveloped immune systems and nascent microbiome communities. Patients often spend several months in the same room, and it has been previously shown that the gut microbiomes of these infants often resemble the microbes found in the NICU. Little is known, however, about the identity, persistence, and absolute abundance of NICU room-associated bacteria over long stretches of time. Here, we couple droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), 16S rRNA gene surveys, and recently published metagenomics data from infant gut samples to infer the extent to which the NICU microbiome is shaped by its room occupants.

resultsOver 2832 swabs, wipes, and air samples were collected from 16 private-style NICU rooms housing very low birth weight (< 1500 g), premature (< 31 weeks' gestation) infants. For each infant, room samples were collected daily, Monday through Friday, for 1 month. The first samples from the first infant and the last samples from the last infant were collected 383 days apart. Twenty-two NICU locations spanning room surfaces, hands, electronics, sink basins, and air were collected. Results point to an incredibly simple room community where 5-10 taxa, mostly skin-associated, account for over 50% of the amplicon reads. Biomass estimates reveal four to five orders of magnitude difference between the least to the most dense microbial communities, air, and sink basins, respectively. Biomass trends from bioaerosol samples and petri dish dust collectors suggest occupancy to be a main driver of suspended biological particles within the NICU. Using a machine learning algorithm to classify the origin of room samples, we show that each room has a unique microbial fingerprint. Several important taxa driving this model were dominant gut colonizers of infants housed within each room.

conclusionsDespite regular cleaning of hospital surfaces, bacterial biomass was detectable at varying densities. A room-specific microbiome signature was detected, suggesting microbes seeding NICU surfaces are sourced from reservoirs within the room and that these reservoirs contain actively dividing cells. Collectively, the data suggests that hospitalized infants, in combination with their caregivers, shape the microbiome of NICU rooms.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalAerosolsBacteriaBase SequenceDustFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightPremature BirthRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASkinAerosolsDustRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBuilt environmentInfant gutMicrobiomeNeonatal intensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID29925423
PMCPMC6011520
OpenAlexW2950333413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.