Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29925422›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Physiological and immunological responses to Culicoides sonorensis blood-feeding: a murine model.

Christopher J Lehiy, Lindsey M Reister-Hendricks, Mark G Ruder, D Scott McVey, Barbara S Drolet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Large-scale production ofFrontiers in tropical diseases · 2024
    Article
  3. Increased Virulence ofViruses · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impacts of Infectious Dose, Feeding Behavior, and Age ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher J LehiyArthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Manhattan, KS, 66502, USA.
Lindsey M Reister-HendricksArthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Manhattan, KS, 66502, USA.
Mark G RuderSoutheastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
D Scott McVeyArthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Manhattan, KS, 66502, USA.
Barbara S DroletArthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Manhattan, KS, 66502, USA. barbara.drolet@ars.usda.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7414-4512
Agricultural Research Service · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

Agricultural Research Service 3020-32000-007Agricultural Research Service 3020-32000-010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHematophagous Culicoides spp. biting midges are of great agricultural importance as livestock, equine, and wildlife pests and as vectors of the orbiviruses bluetongue, epizootic hemorrhagic disease and African horse sickness. To obtain a blood meal, midges deposit saliva containing allergens, proteases, and anti-hemostatic factors, into the dermis to facilitate feeding. Infected midges deposit virus along with the myriad of salivary proteins during feeding. The extreme efficiency with which midges are able to transmit orbiviruses is not clearly understood, as much is still unknown about the physiological trauma of the bite and immune responses to saliva deposited during feeding. Of particular interest are the first few hours and days after the bite; a critical time period for any midge-transmitted virus to quickly establish a localized infection and disseminate, while avoiding the hosts' immune responses.

resultsA mouse-midge feeding model using colonized Culicoides sonorensis midges was used to characterize innate mammalian immune responses to blood-feeding. Histological analysis of skin, and cellular and cytokine profiles of draining lymph nodes show Culicoides midge feeding elicited a potent pro-inflammatory Th-mediated cellular response with significant mast cell activation, subcutaneous hematomas, hypodermal edema and dermal capillary vasodilation, and rapid infiltration of leukocytes to the bite sites. Mast cell degranulation, triggered by bite trauma and specifically by midge saliva, was key to physiological and immunological responses and the ability of midges to feed to repletion.

conclusionsMidge feeding causes physiological and immunological responses that would be highly favorable for rapid infection and systemic dissemination orbiviruses if delivered during blood-feeding. Recruitment of leukocytic cells to bitten skin brings susceptible cell populations in proximity of deposited virus within hours of feeding. Infected cells would drain to lymph nodes, which become hyperplastic in response to saliva, and result in robust viral replication in expanding cell populations and dissemination via the lymph system. Additionally, saliva-induced vasodilation and direct breaches in dermal capillaries by biting mouthparts exposes susceptible vascular endothelial cells, thereby providing immediate sites of virus replication and a dissemination route via the circulatory system. This research provides insights into the efficiency of Culicoides midges as orbivirus vectors.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorAnimalsCell DegranulationCeratopogonidaeDisease Models, AnimalFemaleInsect Bites and StingsLeukocytesMast CellsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CBiteCulicoides sonorensisInnate immunityMiceMidgeSaliva

Identifiers

PMID29925422
PMCPMC6011595
OpenAlexW2808810371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.