Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29925332›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2018

Development, modelling, and pilot testing of a complex intervention to support end-of-life care provided by Danish general practitioners.

Anna Kirstine Winthereik, Mette Asbjoern Neergaard, Anders Bonde Jensen, Peter Vedsted

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02050256 (Improving End-of-life Care by Continuing Medical Education and Electronic Decision Making Support for General Practitioners in Denmark - an Intervention Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02050256 nawithdrawnnot on this map

Improving End-of-life Care by Continuing Medical Education and Electronic Decision Making Support for General Practitioners in Denmark - an Intervention Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2014 to 2014Enrolled0ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Metastatic CancerArmscontinuing medical education and electronic decision support, education and electronic support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna Kirstine WinthereikDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Noerrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. akwi@oncology.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-9211-3309
Mette Asbjoern NeergaardPalliative Care Team, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Noerrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anders Bonde JensenDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Noerrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Peter VedstedResearch Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost patients in end-of-life with life-threatening diseases prefer to be cared for and die at home. Nevertheless, the majority die in hospitals. GPs have a pivotal role in providing end-of-life care at patients' home, and their involvement in the palliative trajectory enhances the patient's possibility to stay at home. The aim of this study was to develop and pilot-test an intervention consisting of continuing medical education (CME) and electronic decision support (EDS) to support end-of-life care in general practice.

methodsWe developed an intervention in line with the first phases of the guidelines for complex interventions drawn up by the Medical Research Council. Phase 1 involved the development of the intervention including identification of key barriers to provision of end-of-life care for GPs and of facilitators of change. Furthermore the actual modelling of two components: CME meeting and EDS. Phase 2 focused on pilot-testing and intervention assessment by process evaluation.

resultsIn phase 1 lack of identification of patients at the end of life and limited palliative knowledge among GPs were identified as barriers. The CME meeting and the EDS were developed. The CME meeting was a four-hour educational meeting performed by GPs and specialists in palliative care. The EDS consisted of two parts: a pop-up window for each patient with palliative needs and a list of all patients with palliative needs in the practice. The pilot testing in phase 2 showed that the CME meeting was performed as intended and 120 (14%) of the GPs in the region attended. The EDS was integrated in existing electronic records but was shut down early for external reasons; 50 (5%) GPs signed up. The pilot-testing demonstrated a need to strengthen the implementation as attending rate was low in the current set-up.

conclusionWe developed a complex intervention to support GPs in providing end-of-life care. The pilot-test showed general acceptance of the CME meetings. The EDS was shut down early and needs further evaluation before examining the whole intervention in a larger study, where evaluation could be based on patient-related outcomes and impact on end-of-life care.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02050256 ) January 30, 2014.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesOrganizational InnovationPhysician's RoleTerminal CareAttitude of Health PersonnelChange ManagementDenmarkGeneral PractitionersHumansNeeds AssessmentPalliative CarePilot ProjectsTerminally IllCancerClinical decision support systemsComplex interventionContinuing medical educationCOPDDenmarkEnd-of-life careGeneral practicePalliative care

Identifiers

PMID29925332
PMCPMC6011239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.