ArticleBiophysical journal2018
Influence of Pulsed Electric Fields and Mitochondria-Cytoskeleton Interactions on Cell Respiration.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-intensity irreversible electroporation targeting intracellular structures enhance tumor ablation in lung cancer models.PloS one · 2026Article
- Additive protection of transcranial direct current stimulation and mitochondrial transplantation on ischemic stroke via inducing A2 astrocytes.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Article
- Use of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to Measure the Impact of Parasitic Infection on Goat Sperm Quality.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Pillar arrays as tunable interfacial barriers for microphysiological systems.Communications engineering · 2025Article
- Effects of ultra-fast nanosecond electric pulses on mitochondria transmembrane potential and oxidation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Microsecond pulsed electric fields induce myocardial ablation by secondary mitochondrial damage and cell death mechanisms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Involvement of Mitochondria in the Selective Response to Microsecond Pulsed Electric Fields on Healthy and Cancer Stem Cells in the Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Synergistic In Vitro Anticancer Toxicity of Pulsed Electric Fields and Glutathione.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Effects of Ultra-Short Pulsed Electric Field Exposure on Glioblastoma Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Deletion ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Complex II subunit SDHD is critical for cell growth and metabolism, which can be partially restored with a synthetic ubiquinone analog.BMC molecular and cell biology · 2021Article
- Complex I protein NDUFS2 is vital for growth, ROS generation, membrane integrity, apoptosis, and mitochondrial energetics.Mitochondrion · 2021Article
- Single Cell Forces after Electroporation.ACS nano · 2021Article
- Rapid and Efficient Gene Editing for Direct Transplantation of Naive Murine Cas9Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Energy Metabolism Decline in the Aging Brain-Pathogenesis of Neurodegenerative Disorders.Metabolites · 2020Review
- Cytoskeletal Disruption after Electroporation and Its Significance to Pulsed Electric Field Therapies.Cancers · 2020Review
- Characterization of Ablation Thresholds for 3D-Cultured Patient-Derived Glioma Stem Cells in Response to High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pulsed electric fields with microsecond pulse width (μsPEFs) are used clinically; namely, irreversible electroporation/Nanoknife is used for soft tissue tumor ablation. The μsPEF pulse parameters used in irreversible electroporation (0.5-1 kV/cm, 80-100 pulses, ∼100 μs each, 1 Hz frequency) may cause an internal field to develop within the cell because of the disruption of the outer cell membrane and subsequent penetration of the electric field. An internal field may disrupt voltage-sensitive mitochondria, although the research literature has been relatively unclear regarding whether such disruptions occur with μsPEFs. This investigation reports the influence of clinically used μsPEF parameters on mitochondrial respiration in live cells. Using a high-throughput Agilent Seahorse machine, it was observed that μsPEF exposure comprising 80 pulses with amplitudes of 600 or 700 V/cm did not alter mitochondrial respiration in 4T1 cells measured after overnight postexposure recovery. To record alterations in mitochondrial function immediately after μsPEF exposure, high-resolution respirometry was used to measure the electron transport chain state via responses to glutamate-malate and ADP and mitochondrial membrane potential via response to carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone. In addition to measuring immediate mitochondrial responses to μsPEF exposure, measurements were also made on cells permeabilized using digitonin and those with compromised cytoskeleton due to actin depolymerization via treatment with the drug latrunculin B. The former treatment was used as a control to tease out the effects of plasma membrane permeabilization, whereas the latter was used to investigate indirect effects on the mitochondria that may occur if μsPEFs impact the cytoskeleton on which the mitochondria are anchored. Based on the results, it was concluded that within the pulse parameters tested, μsPEFs alone do not hinder mitochondrial physiology but can be used to impact the mitochondria upon compromising the actin. Mitochondrial susceptibility to μsPEF after actin depolymerization provides, to our knowledge, a novel avenue for cancer therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.