Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29924908›Full record

ArticleMolecular nutrition & food research2018

Heterocyclic Analogs of Sulforaphane Trigger DNA Damage and Impede DNA Repair in Colon Cancer Cells: Interplay of HATs and HDACs.

Adaobi Okonkwo, Joy Mitra, Gavin S Johnson, Li Li, Wan Mohaiza Dashwood, Muralidhar L Hegde, Chen Yue, Roderick H Dashwood, Praveen Rajendran

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular nutrition & food research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Adaobi OkonkwoCenter for Epigenetics and Disease Prevention, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA, 77030.
Joy MitraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA, 77030.
Gavin S JohnsonCenter for Epigenetics and Disease Prevention, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA, 77030.
Li LiCenter for Epigenetics and Disease Prevention, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA, 77030.
Wan Mohaiza DashwoodCenter for Epigenetics and Disease Prevention, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA, 77030.
Muralidhar L HegdeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA, 77030.
Chen YueThe State Key Laboratory of Elemento-Organic Chemistry, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), College of Pharmacy, and Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug Research, Nankai University, Tianjin, China, 300071.
Roderick H DashwoodCenter for Epigenetics and Disease Prevention, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA, 77030.
Praveen RajendranCenter for Epigenetics and Disease Prevention, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA, 77030.
Houston Methodist · USPrevention Institute · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · USCollaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering Tianjin · CNTexas A&M Health Science Center · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

Transplacental Chemoprevention of Lung Tumors and LymphomasP01CA090890 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI DASHWOOD, RODERICK H · 2003 to 2014
$14.2M
Dietary HDAC Inhibitors in Colon Cancer PreventionR01CA122959 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI DASHWOOD, RODERICK H · 2008 to 2023
$4.3M
Etiological Linkage of DNA Damage/Repair Deficiency in Neurodegenerative DiseasesR01NS088645 · NINDS · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HEGDE, MURALIDHAR L · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
Chancellor's Research Initiative R01 NS088645CSR NIH HHS CA090890CSR NIH HHS CA122959John S. Dunn FoundationNCI NIH HHS P01 CA090890NCI NIH HHS R01 CA122959NIH HHS CA090890NIH HHS CA122959NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

scopeDNA repair inhibitors have broad clinical applications in tumor types with DNA repair defects, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Structural analogs of the anticancer agent sulforaphane (SFN) were investigated as modifiers of histone deacetylase (HDAC) and histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity, and for effects on DNA damage/repair pertinent to human CRC. METHODS AND

resultsIn the polyposis in rat colon (Pirc) model, single oral administration of SFN and structurally related long-chain isothiocyanates (ITCs) decreased histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) expression and increased pH2AX levels markedly in adenomatous colon polyps, extending prior observations on HDAC3 inhibition/turnover in cell-based assays. Colon cancer cells at a high initial plating density had diminished cytotoxicity from SFN, whereas novel tetrazole-containing heterocyclic analogs of SFN retained their efficacy. The potent SFN analogs triggered DNA damage, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and loss of a key DNA repair regulator, C-terminal binding protein (CtBP) interacting protein (CtIP). These SFN analogs also altered HAT/HDAC activities and histone acetylation status, lowered the expression of HDAC3, P300/CBP-associated factor (PCAF) and lysine acetyltransferase 2A (KAT2A/GCN5), and attenuated homologous recombination (HR)/non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair activities in colon cancer cells.

conclusionNovel tetrazole-containing heterocyclic analogs of SFN provide a new avenue for chemosensitization in colon cancer cells via modulation of HAT/HDAC activities and associated DNA damage/repair signaling pathways.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisBrassicaCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Line, TumorColonic NeoplasmsDNA DamageDNA RepairFemaleGene Expression RegulationHCT116 CellsHEK293 CellsHistone AcetyltransferasesHistone Deacetylase 3Histone DeacetylasesHumans1H-tetrazoleHistone AcetyltransferasesHistone Deacetylase 3Histone DeacetylasesIsothiocyanatesp300-CBP-Associated Factorp300-CBP Transcription FactorssulforaphaneSulfoxidesTetrazolescolon cancerC-terminal binding protein (CtBP) interacting proteinDNA damageDNA repairhistone acetyltransferasehistone deacetylasesulforaphane analogs

Identifiers

PMID29924908
PMCPMC6553464
OpenAlexW2809582232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.