Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29924854›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Food restriction promotes damage reduction in rat models of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Carlos Vinicius Dalto da Rosa, Jéssica Men de Campos, Anacharis Babeto de Sá Nakanishi, Jurandir Fernando Comar, Isabela Peixoto Martins, Paulo Cézar de Freitas Mathias, Maria Montserrat Diaz Pedrosa, Vilma Aparecida Ferreira de Godoi, Maria Raquel Marçal Natali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Whey protein enriched withJournal of food science and technology · 2021
    Article
  3. Journal of nutritional science · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carlos Vinicius Dalto da RosaDepartment of Morphological Sciences, State University of Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9428-630X
Jéssica Men de CamposDepartment of Morphological Sciences, State University of Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Anacharis Babeto de Sá NakanishiDepartment of Biochemistry, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Jurandir Fernando ComarDepartment of Biochemistry, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Isabela Peixoto MartinsDepartment of Biotechnology, Cell Biology and Genetics State University of Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6994-4585
Paulo Cézar de Freitas MathiasDepartment of Biotechnology, Cell Biology and Genetics State University of Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Maria Montserrat Diaz PedrosaDepartment of Physiological Sciences, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0596-3557
Vilma Aparecida Ferreira de GodoiDepartment of Physiological Sciences, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Maria Raquel Marçal NataliDepartment of Morphological Sciences, State University of Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Maringá · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are several animal models of type 2 diabetes mellitus induction but the comparison between models is scarce. Food restriction generates benefits, such as reducing oxidative stress, but there are few studies on its effects on diabetes. The objective of this study is to evaluate the differences in physiological and biochemical parameters between diabetes models and their responses to food restriction. For this, 30 male Wistar rats were distributed in 3 groups (n = 10/group): control (C); diabetes with streptozotocin and cafeteria-style diet (DE); and diabetes with streptozotocin and nicotinamide (DN), all treated for two months (pre-food restriction period). Then, the 3 groups were subdivided into 6, generating the groups CC (control), CCR (control+food restriction), DEC (diabetic+standard diet), DER (diabetic+food restriction), DNC (diabetic+standard diet) and DNR (diabetic+food restriction), treated for an additional two months (food restriction period). The food restriction (FR) used was 50% of the average daily dietary intake of group C. Throughout the treatment, physiological and biochemical parameters were evaluated. At the end of the treatment, serum biochemical parameters, oxidative stress and insulin were evaluated. Both diabetic models produced hyperglycemia, polyphagia, polydipsia, insulin resistance, high fructosamine, hepatic damage and reduced insulin, although only DE presented human diabetes-like alterations, such as dyslipidemia and neuropathy symptoms. Both DEC and DNC diabetic groups presented higher levels of protein carbonyl groups associated to lower antioxidant capacity in the plasma. FR promoted improvement of glycemia in DNR, lipid profile in DER, and insulin resistance and hepatic damage in both diabetes models. FR also reduced the protein carbonyl groups of both DER and DNR diabetic groups, but the antioxidant capacity was improved only in the plasma of DER group. It is concluded that FR is beneficial for diabetes but should be used in conjunction with other therapies.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionAbdominal FatAnimalsBody WeightDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DietDisease Models, AnimalDrinking BehaviorFeeding BehaviorGlucoseHyperglycemiaInsulinInsulin ResistanceInsulin-Secreting CellsMaleOxidative StressGlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID29924854
PMCPMC6010257
OpenAlexW2809118679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.