Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29924851›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index as a prognostic factor for radical prostatectomy outcomes of very high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Jae Won Park, Dong Hoon Koh, Won Sik Jang, Joo Yong Lee, Kang Su Cho, Won Sik Ham, Koon Ho Rha, Woo Hee Jung, Sung Joon Hong, Young Deuk Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hypogonadism and its treatment among prostate cancer survivors.International journal of impotence research · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jae Won ParkDepartment of Urology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Dong Hoon KohDepartment of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Won Sik JangDepartment of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Joo Yong LeeDepartment of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kang Su ChoDepartment of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Won Sik HamDepartment of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Koon Ho RhaDepartment of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Woo Hee JungDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Joon HongDepartment of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Young Deuk ChoiDepartment of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8545-5797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProstate cancer (PC) is a devastating and heterogeneous condition with diverse treatment options. When selecting treatments for patients with very high-risk PC, clinicians must consider patient comorbidities. We investigated the efficacy of the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) as a prognostic factor for patient outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively investigated the medical records of PC patients at our institution who underwent RP from 1992 to 2010. Very high-risk PC was defined according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Patients with incomplete medical records or who had received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Preoperative comorbidity was evaluated by the ACCI, and the prognostic efficacy of the ACCI was analyzed using univariable and multivariable Cox regression, competing risk regression model and Kaplan-Meier curves.

resultsOur final analysis included 228 men with a median age of 66 years (interquartile range 62-71) and median prostate specific antigen of 10.7 ng/mL. There were 41 (18%) patients with an ACCI score >3 and 88 (38.6%) patients with a biopsy Gleason score >8. Preoperative evaluation revealed that 159 patients (69.7%) had a non-organ confined tumor (≥T3). Following RP, 8-year prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 91.6% and 83.4%, respectively. Competing risk regression analysis revealed that ACCI was significantly associated with other-cause survival and OS (p<0.05).

conclusionThe ACCI is an effective prognostic factor for other-cause survival and OS in very high-risk PC patients. RP should be considered carefully for patients with an ACCI score >3.

Indexed as

ProstatectomyAgedAge FactorsDisease-Free SurvivalHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProstatic NeoplasmsRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29924851
PMCPMC6010269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.