Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29924843›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

The sero-prevalence of brucellosis in cattle and their herders in Bahr el Ghazal region, South Sudan.

Nuol Aywel Madut, Adrian Muwonge, George William Nasinyama, John Bwalya Muma, Jacques Godfroid, Ambrose Samuel Jubara, James Muleme, Clovice Kankya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Seroprevalence of Bovine Brucellosis in Selected Districts of Zambia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nuol Aywel MadutDepartment of Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Bahr el Ghazal, Wau, South Sudan.
Adrian MuwongeDiv. Genetics and Genomics, The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, United kingdom.
George William NasinyamaDepartment of Biosecurity, Ecosystems &Veterinary Public Health (BEP), College of Vet. Animal Resources & Biosecurity (COVAB), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
John Bwalya MumaDepartment of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka Zambia.
Jacques GodfroidDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
Ambrose Samuel JubaraDepartment of Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Bahr el Ghazal, Wau, South Sudan.
James MulemeDepartment of Biosecurity, Ecosystems &Veterinary Public Health (BEP), College of Vet. Animal Resources & Biosecurity (COVAB), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Clovice KankyaDepartment of Biosecurity, Ecosystems &Veterinary Public Health (BEP), College of Vet. Animal Resources & Biosecurity (COVAB), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-6982-912X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrucellosis is a worldwide recognized bacterial zoonotic disease. There is currently no information on bovine brucellosis sero-prevalence in South Sudan regardless of the economic, social and public health impact on populations. Therefore, for the first time in 33 years, we report the sero-prevalence of brucellosis in cattle and their herders. Furthermore, we characterize the drivers associated with the disease at the human-animal interface in Bahr el Ghazal region, South Sudan.

methodsA total of 893 and 87 animal and human sera respectively were examined between December 2015 and May 2016. Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) and Competitive Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay (c-ELISA) were used in parallel to detect anti-Brucella antibodies. Questionnaires were administered to collect relevant metadata used for the association analysis in R version 3.2.3. Odds Ratio (OR) and Confidence Intervals (CI) were determined.

resultsOverall bovine brucellosis prevalence was 31% (95%CI = 28.0-34.2), with the highest 63% (95%CI = 53-70) and lowest 10% (95%CI = 4.5-20.1) prevalence estimates in Wau and Gogrial states respectively. The bovine sero-prevalence was approximately equally distributed among the male 30.4% (26.9-34.2) and the females 32.5% (26.8-38.7). Poor body condition (OR = 0.22; 95%CI = 0.07-0.54) and larger herd sizes (OR = 0.05; 95%CI = 0.008-0.173) were protective factors for brucellosis, while the opposite was true for the second (OR = 1.70; 95%CI = 1.08-2.67) and third (OR = 2.5; 95%CI = 1.46-4.47) lactation stage. The overall brucellosis sero-prevalence in herders was estimated at 33.3% (23.9-44.3).

conclusionWe report a high prevalence of anti-Brucella antibodies in cattle and their herders in Bahr el Ghazal, indicating an enzootic status in the cattle population being an important source of infection for humans. This represents a genuine public health challenge. Therefore, there is need to raise awareness and build capacity and infrastructure in this fragile state to underwrite future public health strategies for brucellosis.

Indexed as

Seroepidemiologic StudiesAdolescentAdultAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBrucellaBrucellosisBrucellosis, BovineCattleChildCross-Sectional StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansLactationMaleAntibodies, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID29924843
PMCPMC6010255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.