Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29924837›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Barriers and facilitators for GPs in dementia advance care planning: A systematic integrative review.

Bram Tilburgs, Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, Raymond Koopmans, Hans van Gennip, Yvonne Engels, Marieke Perry

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Evidence on Advance Care Planning for People with Dementia - A Systematic Review (2017-2023)].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Complex advance care planning intervention in general practice (ACP-GP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A program of SUPPORT-DPalliative & supportive care · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Understanding Dementia Carer Experiences Before Admission to a Residential Aged Care Facility: Implications for Integrated Care.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bram TilburgsDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1588-004X
Myrra Vernooij-DassenDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Raymond KoopmansDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hans van GennipIndependent Educational Researcher, Family carer, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Yvonne EngelsDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marieke PerryDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the disease's progressive nature, advance care planning (ACP) is recommended for people with early stage dementia. General practitioners (GPs) should initiate ACP because of their longstanding relationships with their patients and their early involvement with the disease, however ACP is seldom applied.

aimTo determine the barriers and facilitators faced by GPs related to ACP with people with dementia. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched the relevant databases for papers published between January 1995 and December 2016, using the terms: primary healthcare, GP, dementia, and ACP. We conducted a systematic integrative review following Whittemore and Knafl's method. Papers containing empirical data about GP barriers and/or facilitators regarding ACP for people with dementia were included. We evaluated quality using the Mixed-Method-Appraisal-Tool and analyzed data using qualitative content analysis.

resultsTen qualitative, five quantitative, and one mixed-method paper revealed four themes: timely initiation of ACP, stakeholder engagement, important aspects of ACP the conversation, and prerequisites for ACP. Important barriers were: uncertainty about the timing of ACP, how to plan for an uncertain future, lack of knowledge about dementia, difficulties assessing people with dementia's decisional capacities, and changing preferences. Facilitators for ACP were: an early start when cognitive decline is still mild, inclusion of all stakeholders, and discussing social and medical issues aimed at maintaining normal life.

conclusionDiscussing future care is difficult due to uncertainties about the future and the decisional capacities of people with dementia. Based on the facilitators, we recommend that GPs use a timely and goal-oriented approach and involve all stakeholders. ACP discussions should focus on the ability of people with dementia to maintain normal daily function as well as on their quality of life, instead of end-of-life-discussions only. GPs need training to acquire knowledge and skills to timely initiate collaborative ACP discussions.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningDatabases, FactualDementiaGeneral PractitionersHealth FacilitiesHumansQualitative ResearchStakeholder Participation

Identifiers

PMID29924837
PMCPMC6010277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.