Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29924828›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Factors which contributed for low quality sputum smears for the detection of acid fast bacilli (AFB) at selected health centers in Ethiopia: A quality control perspective.

Ayehu Mekonen, Yeshi Ayele, Yifru Berhan, Desalegn Woldeyohannes, Woldaregay Erku, Solomon Sisay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Development and validation of external quality assessment panels for mycobacterial culture testing to diagnose tuberculosis in China.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ayehu MekonenManagement Science for Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Yeshi AyeleWest HarargheZonal Health Department, TB and HIV Case Team, Chiro, Ethiopia.
Yifru BerhanCollege of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Desalegn WoldeyohannesDepartment of Animal Health and Zoonoses, Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Woldaregay ErkuDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Parasitology and Immunology, Addis Ababa University, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Solomon SisayFederal Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-1965-2837
Addis Ababa University · ETFederal Ministry of Health · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesQuality of tuberculosis (TB) microscopy diagnosis is not a guarantee despite implementation of External Quality Assurance (EQA) service in all laboratories of health facilities. Hence, we aimed at evaluating the technical quality and the findings of sputum smear microscopy for acid fast bacilli (AFB) at health centers in Hararge Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia.

methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out between July 8, 2014 and July 7, 2015.A pre-tested structured questionnaire was used to collect data. Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) method was put into practice for collecting all necessary sample slides. Data were analyzed by using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 20 software. P-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

resultsOf the total55 health center laboratories which had been assessed during the study period, 20 (36.4%) had major technical errors; 13 (23.6%) had 15 false negative results and 17 (30.9%) had 22 false positive results. Moreover, poor specimen quality, smear size, smear thickness, staining and evenness were indicated in 40 (72.7%), 39 (70.9%), 37 (67.3%), 27(49.1%) and 37 (67.3%) of the collected samples, respectively. False negative AFB findings were significantly associated with lack of Internal Quality Control (IQC) measures (AOR (Adjusted Odds Ratio): 2.90 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 1.25,6.75) and poor staining procedures (AOR: 2.16(95% CI: 1.01, 5.11).

conclusionsThe qualities of AFB smear microscopy reading and smearing were low in most of the laboratories of the health centers. Therefore, it is essential to strength EQA program through building the capacity of laboratory professionals.

Indexed as

Quality ControlBacteriological TechniquesConfidence IntervalsCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsHumansLaboratoriesMicroscopyMycobacterium tuberculosisOdds RatioQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality ImprovementSpecimen HandlingSputum

Identifiers

PMID29924828
PMCPMC6010281
OpenAlexW2808983527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.