Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29924659›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2018

Antenatal Hospital Utilization Among Women at Risk for Disability.

Karen M Clements, Monika Mitra, Jianying Zhang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antepartum hospital use and delivery outcomes in California.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karen M Clements1 Center for Health Policy and Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School , Shrewsbury, Massachusetts.
Monika Mitra3 Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts.
Jianying Zhang3 Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts.

Funding

Health Needs and Barriers to Perinatal Care for Women with Mobility DisabilitiesR01HD074581 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI MITRA, MONIKA · 2013 to 2015
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the effect of potentially disabling health conditions on healthcare utilization during pregnancy. Using hospital discharge data, we identified women at risk for disability and evaluated antenatal hospital utilization, including emergency department (ED), observational stay (OS), and inpatient (IP) visits, by underlying health condition. MATERIALS AND

methodsMassachusetts Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal data system linked 2007-2009 birth certificates to 2006-2009 discharges. Access Risk Classification System categorized ICD-9-CM/Current Procedural Terminology codes recorded at delivery into disability risk groups (no/low vs. medium/high). Women were further categorized based on delivery diagnoses. Cox models evaluated the association between disability risk and utilization. Utilization by prenatal care and visit reason was examined.

resultsOf 221,867 women, 4.0% were at medium/high risk of disability. Mental illness (26.9%) and circulatory system (25.2%) diagnoses were most common. More than 2% had comorbid mental/physical conditions. Women at risk for disability were more likely than women not at risk to have an antenatal ED (37.1% vs. 25.0%), OS (19.1% vs. 13.1%), or nondelivery IP visit (11.5% vs. 4.0%) (p ≤ 0.001 for each). Utilization varied by diagnosis. In adjusted analyses, women with two or more physical conditions had highest rate of ED visit (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.8-2.8) and OS/IP visit (HR = 2.9, 95% 2.3-3.6) compared with women not at risk. Inadequate prenatal care was associated with increased utilization across all disability risk groups. ED visits for mental illness were high across groups.

conclusionsDisability risk identified in discharge data is associated with elevated antenatal hospital utilization. Utilization varies by underlying diagnosis.

Indexed as

AdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansInpatientsMassachusettsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePersons with DisabilitiesPregnancyPrenatal CareRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adultantenataldisabilityhealthcare utilization

Identifiers

PMID29924659
PMCPMC6104252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.