Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29923843›Full record

ArticleFemale pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery2020

Predictors of Postdischarge Surgical Recovery Following Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Michael Heit, Janet S Carpenter, Chen X Chen, Ryan Stewart, Jennifer Hamner, Kevin L Rand

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04897061 (Impact of Home Support on Quality of Post-operative Recovery After Major Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04897061 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Home Support on Quality of Post-operative Recovery After Major Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRan2021 to 2022Enrolled103ConditionsPelvic Organ Prolapse
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael HeitFrom the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine.
Janet S CarpenterScience of Nursing Care Department.
Chen X ChenDepartment of Community and Health Systems, School of Nursing, Indiana University.
Ryan StewartFrom the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine.
Jennifer HamnerFrom the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine.
Kevin L RandDepartment of Psychology, School of Science, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN.
Indiana University Health · US

Funding

INDIANA UNIVERSITY: TRAINING IN BEHAVIORAL NURSINGT32NR007066 · NINR · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI RAWL, SUSAN M · 1990 to 2017
$4.2M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteKL2TR001106 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001106NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur aim was to identify sociodemographic/clinical, surgical, and psychosocial predictors of postdischarge surgical recovery after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

methodsStudy participants (N = 171) with at least stage 2 pelvic organ prolapse completed a preoperative survey measuring hypothesized sociodemographic/clinical, surgical, and psychosocial recovery predictors followed by a postoperative survey at 4 time points (days 7, 14, 42, and 90) that included the Postdischarge Surgical Recovery 13 scale. One multivariate linear regression model was constructed for each time point to regress Postdischarge Surgical Recovery 13 scores on an a priori set of hypothesized predictors. All variables that had P < 0.1 were considered significant predictors of recovery because of the exploratory nature of this study and focus on model building rather than model testing.

resultsPredictors of recovery at 1 or more time points included the following: sociodemographic/clinical predictors: older age, higher body mass index, fewer comorbidities, and greater preoperative pain predicted greater recovery; surgical predictors: fewer perioperative complications and greater change in the leading edge of prolapse after surgery predicted greater recovery; psychosocial predictors: less endorsement of doctor's locus of control, greater endorsement of other's locus of control, and less sick role investment predicted greater recovery.

conclusionsIdentified sociodemographic/clinical, surgical, and psychosocial predictors should provide physicians with evidence-based guidance on recovery times for patients and family members. This knowledge is critical for informing future research to determine if these predictors are modifiable by changes to our narrative during the preoperative consultation visit. These efforts may reduce the postdischarge surgical recovery for patients with pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, accepting the unique demands on each individual's time.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansLaparoscopyMiddle AgedPelvic Organ ProlapsePostoperative PeriodProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID29923843
PMCPMC6301123
OpenAlexW2809182123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.