ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology2019
Mapping of the available standards against the regulatory needs for nanomedicines.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed.
- The tumor microenvironment in triple negative breast cancer and a strategy to improve responses to immunotherapy using cryoablation and immunostimulants.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Review
- Breaking barriers: nano-boosted drug delivery systems in overcoming the defenses of pancreatic cancer.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle-Based Biomaterials in Cancer Research: From Mechanistic Insights to Therapeutic Innovation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mucoadhesive nanofibers for ocular drug delivery: mechanisms, design strategies, and applications.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Review
- Multifunctional Nanoparticles in Traumatic Brain Injury: From Targeted Imaging and Diagnosis to Innovative Therapeutics.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Biomimetic Cell Membrane-coated Nanovaccines in Anti-tumor Immunotherapy.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Nanomedicine in Ovarian Cancer: Advances in Imaging, Targeted Delivery, and Theranostic Therapeutic Platforms.Cancers · 2025Review
- Beyond borders: engineering organ-targeted immunotherapies to overcome site-specific barriers in cancer.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025Review
- Regulating nanomedicines: challenges, opportunities, and the path forward.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Nanoparticle Therapeutics in Clinical Perspective: Classification, Marketed Products, and Regulatory Landscape.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Review
- Nanotechnology-Driven Drug Delivery Systems for Lung Cancer: Computational Advances and Clinical Perspectives.Thoracic cancer · 2025Review
- Nanobiotechnologies for stroke treatment.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Next-Generation Vaccine Platforms: Integrating Synthetic Biology, Nanotechnology, and Systems Immunology for Improved Immunogenicity.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Nanoscale reference and test materials for the validation of characterization methods for engineered nanomaterials - current state, limitations, and needs.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Nanotechnology Driven Lipid and Metalloid Based Formulations Targeting Blood-Brain Barrier (3B) for Brain Tumor.Indian journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- An Australian perspective on clinical, economic and regulatory considerations in emerging nanoparticle therapies for infections.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025Review
- Nanotoxicology: developments and new insights.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- A review on the role of nanoparticles for targeted brain drug delivery: synthesis, characterization, and applications.EXCLI journal · 2025Review
- Nano(bio)Materials Do Not Affect Macrophage Phenotype-A Study Conducted by the REFINE Project.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Appropriate documentary standards and reference materials are crucial building blocks for the development of innovative products. In order to support the emerging sector of nanomedicine, relevant standards must be identified and/or developed before the products will enter into the regulatory approval process. The anticipation of standardization needs requires a good understanding on the regulatory information requirements that can be triggered by the particularities of nanomedicines. However, robust datasets allowing firm conclusions on regulatory demands are not yet available due to a lack of regulatory experience with innovative products. Such a catch-22 situation can only be advanced in an iterative process by monitoring continuously the scientific evidence and by promoting intensive knowledge exchange between all involved stakeholders. In this study, we have compiled information requirements released by regulatory scientists so far and mapped it against available standards that could be of relevance for nanomedicines. Our gap analysis clearly demonstrated that for some endpoints such as drug release/loading and the interaction of nanomedicines with the immune system no standards are available so far. The emerging nanomedicine sector could benefit from cross-sector collaboration and review the suitability of standards that have been developed for nanomaterials used for other industrial applications. Only a concerted action of all parties can lead to a smooth translation of nanomedicines to clinical application and to the market. This is in particular important because nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems are key for the development and implementation of personalized medicine. This article is characterized under: Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Regulatory and Policy Issues in Nanomedicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.