Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29923345›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2018

Detection of prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI utilizing the anatomic structure of the prostate.

Jin Jin, Lin Zhang, Ethan Leng, Gregory J Metzger, Joseph S Koopmeiners

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Training Convolutional Networks for Prostate Segmentation With Limited Data.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jin JinDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Lin ZhangDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Ethan LengCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Gregory J MetzgerCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Joseph S KoopmeinersDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6147-3168

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Jeffrey S. Miller · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
NMR Imaging and SpectroscopyP41EB015894 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL · 2012 to 2017
$8.4M
Development of an Optimal MRI Platform for Prostate Investigations at 7 TeslaR01CA155268 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI METZGER, GREGORY JOHN · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155268NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), which combines traditional anatomic and newer quantitative MRI methods, has been shown to result in improved voxel-wise classification of prostate cancer as compared with any single MRI parameter. While these results are promising, substantial heterogeneity in the mpMRI parameter values and voxel-wise prostate cancer risk has been observed both between and within regions of the prostate. This suggests that classification of prostate cancer can potentially be improved by incorporating structural information into the classifier. In this paper, we propose a novel voxel-wise classifier of prostate cancer that accounts for the anatomic structure of the prostate by Bayesian hierarchical modeling, which can be combined with post hoc spatial Gaussian kernel smoothing to account for residual spatial correlation. Our proposed classifier results in significantly improved area under the ROC curve (0.822 vs 0.729, P < .001) and sensitivity corresponding to 90% specificity (0.599 vs 0.429, P < .001), compared with a baseline model that does not account for the anatomic structure of the prostate. Furthermore, the classifier can also be applied on voxels with missing mpMRI parameters, resulting in similar performance, which is an important practical consideration that cannot be easily accommodated using regression-based classifiers. In addition, our classifier achieved high computational efficiency with a closed-form solution for the posterior predictive cancer probability.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBayes TheoremHumansMaleProstateProstatic NeoplasmsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityBayesian classifiermultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingprostate cancerspatial classifiervoxel-wise classification

Identifiers

PMID29923345
PMCPMC6123293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.