ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2019
Accuracy of electronic health record data for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in persons living with HIV and uninfected persons.
Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Compound drought and heatwave extreme weather events: Mortality risk in individuals with chronic respiratory disease.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- Incidence of Pulmonary Hypertension in the Echocardiography Referral Population.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
- Comorbidities, Tobacco Exposure, and Geography: Added Risk Factors of Heat and Cold Wave-related Mortality among U.S. Veterans with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
- Heat and Cold Wave-Related Mortality Risk among United States Veterans with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Case-Crossover Study.Environmental health perspectives · 2024Article
- Design and methods of a randomized trial testing "Advancing care for COPD in people living with HIV by implementing evidence-based management through proactive E-consults (ACHIEVE)".Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Article
- Racial and ethnic disparities in coronavirus disease 2019 disease incidence independent of comorbidities, among people with HIV in the United States.AIDS (London, England) · 2022Observational
- Racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 disease incidence independent of comorbidities, among people with HIV in the US.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Electronic Medical Record-Based Case Phenotyping for the Charlson Conditions: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNo prior studies have addressed the performance of electronic health record (EHR) data to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in people living with HIV (PLWH), in whom COPD could be more likely to be underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed, given the higher frequency of respiratory symptoms and smoking compared with HIV-uninfected (uninfected) persons.
methodsWe determined whether EHR data could improve accuracy of ICD-9 codes to define COPD when compared with spirometry in PLWH vs uninfected, and quantified level of discrimination using the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC). The development cohort consisted of 350 participants who completed research spirometry in the Examinations of HIV Associated Lung Emphysema (EXHALE) study, a pulmonary substudy of the Veterans Aging Cohort Study. Results were externally validated in 294 PLWH who performed spirometry for clinical indications from the University of Washington (UW) site of the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems cohort.
resultsICD-9 codes performed similarly by HIV status, but alone were poor at discriminating cases from non-cases of COPD when compared with spirometry (AUC 0.633 in EXHALE; 0.651 in the UW cohort). However, algorithms that combined ICD-9 codes with other clinical variables available in the EHR-age, smoking, and COPD inhalers-improved discrimination and performed similarly in EXHALE (AUC 0.771) and UW (AUC 0.734).
conclusionsThese data support that EHR data in combination with ICD-9 codes have moderately good accuracy to identify COPD when spirometry data are not available, and perform similarly in PLWH and uninfected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.