ReviewObesity surgery2018
Imaging after Bariatric Surgery: When Interpretation Is a Challenge, from Normal to Abnormal.
Review in Obesity surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- How is 3D modeling in metabolic surgery utilized and what is its clinical benefit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Complication imaging after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: clues to the diagnosis and pitfalls.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Management of Post-Bariatric Surgery Complications: Diagnostic Work-Up and Innovative Approaches for Leak, Fistula, and Stricture Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Oesophageal fluoroscopy in adults-when and why?The British journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Up-to-date review into the evolving world of bariatric interventions: a guide for radiologists.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Review
- Common, Less Common, and Unexpected Complications after Bariatric Surgery: A Pictorial Essay.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Diagnosis and Management of Postoperative Complications After Sleeve Gastrectomy.Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery · 2022Review
- Endoscopic Evaluation and Management of Late Complications After Bariatric Surgery: a Narrative Review.Obesity surgery · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bariatric surgery has proven to be the most effective weight loss strategy in severe obesity. Imaging in the immediate postoperative period of bariatric surgery is not done routinely. However, it is helpful in the assessment of early and late complications, which are estimated to be present in < 1% of patients. In some cases, the imaging interpretation of anatomical outcomes and complications related to these procedures represents a challenge for surgeons and radiologists. The aim of this review is to describe the imagenologic findings after bariatric surgery and focuses on the findings of the most frequent procedures performed in Colombia such as laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Contrasted CT scan and fluoroscopic studies have shown a high sensitivity in the early and late diagnosis of bariatric surgery complications, but in order to be able to appropriately identify these complications, it is important to be familiar with the normal or expected radiological findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.