ReviewJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2019
Guidelines in review: Comparison of ESC and AHA guidance for the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis in adults.
Review in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comparison of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of adjunctive rifampicin versus gentamicin for prosthetic valve endocarditis due toJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025Article
- PET/MR imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023Review
- Can transthoracic echocardiography be used to a greater extent in the diagnostics of infective endocarditis to avoid unnecessary transoesophageal examinations without jeopardising accuracy?Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2023Article
- Infective endocarditis in developing countries: An update.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Guidelines on prosthetic heart valve management in infective endocarditis: a narrative review comparing American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and European Society of Cardiology guidelines.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Debates over NICE Guideline Update: What Are the Roles of Nuclear Cardiology in the Initial Evaluation of Stable Chest Pain?Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Review
- FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis: Expert consensus vs evidence-based practice.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Guidelines in review: Comparison of ESC and AHA guidance for the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis in adults. Are the differences clinically relevant? The European perspective.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over recent years, new evidence has led a rethinking of the available guidance on the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis (IE). This review compares the most recently available guidance provided by the American Heart Association (AHA) IE Writing Committee, and the Task Force for the management of IE of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). This represents the sixth of a new series of comparative guidelines review published in the Journal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.