ArticleJournal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology2018
Acute Intoxications Involving α-Pyrrolidinobutiophenone (α-PBP): Results from the Swedish STRIDA Project.
Article in Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- An unusual way of acute Pyrazolam poisoning in consumer of commercially approved benzodiazepines.Forensic toxicology · 2026Article
- Flakka: New Dangerous Synthetic Cathinone on the Drug Scene.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Designer drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effects.Archives of toxicology · 2020Review
- Drug trends and harm related to new psychoactive substances (NPS) in Sweden from 2010 to 2016: Experiences from the STRIDA project.PloS one · 2020Article
- Interpol review of toxicology 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020Review
- New psychoactive substances: a review and updates.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMany new psychoactive substances (NPS) introduced as recreational drugs have been associated with severe intoxication and death.
methodsBlood and/or urine samples were collected from intoxicated patients treated at Swedish hospitals that participated in the STRIDA project, a nationawide effort to address the growing problem of NPS. In patients undergoing evaluation for drug overdose, α-PBP was identified using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Demographic and clinical data were collected during Poisons Information Centre consultations and retrieved from medical records.
resultsFrom April 2013 to November 2015, 43 patients tested positive for α-PBP. However, α-PBP was never specifically mentioned during consultation but only confirmed analytically. The α-PBP concentrations ranged 2.0-13,200 ng/mL in urine and 2.0-440 ng/mL in serum. The patients were aged 19-57 (mean 34) years, 81% were men, and 73% were known drug addicts. All cases except 1 also involved other NPS and/or classical drugs. MDPV, α-PVP, and other pyrovalerone analogues were the most common other NPS (31 cases; 72%). CNS depressants were detected in 28 cases (65%), with benzodiazepines (16 cases) being most frequent. Main clinical characteristics were agitation/anxiety (59%), tachycardia (54%), and hypertension (37%), and 14 patients (33%) required monitoring in the intensive care unit of which 8 were graded as severe intoxications. No fatalities were reported.
conclusionPatients with intoxication from α-PBP resembled those by NPS cathinones MDPV and α-PVP. As patients never specifically declared α-PBP intake and poly-drug intoxication was common, they may have been unaware of the actual substance taken.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.