ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2018
Cannabinoids for Treatment of MS Symptoms: State of the Evidence.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cannabinoid Activity-Is There a Causal Connection to Spasmolysis in Clinical Studies?Biomolecules · 2021Pooled it
- The Relationship Between (Endo)cannabinoids, the Microbiome and Melanoma.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Review
- Neuropharmacology of Cannabinoids: A Comprehensive Review of Preclinical and Clinical Evidence for Hemp-Derived Extracts and Active Compounds.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Reduced CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Expression in Alzheimer's Disease and Transgenic Mouse Models.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2026Article
- Cannabinoids in Chronic Pain Management: A Review of the History, Efficacy, Applications, and Risks.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Unprescribed cannabinoids and multiple sclerosis: a multicenter, cross-sectional, epidemiological study in Lombardy, Italy.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Clinical Benefits and Safety of Medical Cannabis Products: A Narrative Review on Natural Extracts.Pain and therapy · 2024Review
- Exploring The Contours: Navigating Cannabis Use Among Older Adults.Journal of Brown hospital medicine · 2024Review
- Cannabis as a Source of Approved Drugs: A New Look at an Old Problem.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Polypharmacy in Multiple Sclerosis: Prevalence, Risks, and Mitigation Strategies.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023Review
- G protein-coupled receptors in neurodegenerative diseases and psychiatric disorders.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- The Efficacy of Cannabis on Multiple Sclerosis-Related Symptoms.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Legalizing Medical Cannabis in Lebanon: the Complex Interface Between Medicine, Law, Ethics, and Economics.Cannabis and cannabinoid research · 2022Article
- Symptomatic and restorative therapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.Journal of neurology · 2022Review
- Review
- Cladribine as a Potential Object of Nucleoside Transporter-Based Drug Interactions.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2022Review
- Differentiating Cannabis Products: Drugs, Food, and Supplements.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Cannabis Use among Older Persons with Arthritis, Cancer and Multiple Sclerosis: Are We Comparing Apples and Oranges?Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Cannabinoids in Neurology - Position paper from Scientific Departments from Brazilian Academy of Neurology.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2021Article
- DifferentPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewCannabis and cannabinoids have been used medically and recreationally for thousands of years and recently there has been a growing body of research in this area. With increased access now that medical marijuana is available in many jurisdictions, patients and providers want to know more about the evidence for benefits and risks of cannabinoid use. This paper provides an overview of the available cannabinoid-based formulations, a summary of the highest quality evidence for the use of cannabinoids for treating spasticity and pain associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), and a discussion of possible dosing regimens based on information from these studies. RECENT
findingsTwo recent high-quality systematic reviews concluded that the only strong evidence for medical marijuana in neurological disorders was for reducing the symptoms of patient-reported spasticity and central pain in MS and that the only complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) intervention in MS with strong supportive evidence was cannabinoids. Based on this review, they concluded that nabiximols (Sativex oral spray), oral cannabis extract (OCE), and synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) are probably effective at reducing patient-reported symptoms of spasticity in people with MS, but OCE and synthetic THC were not found to be effective for reducing physician-administered measures of spasticity. In addition, nabiximols, OCE, and synthetic THC are probably effective at reducing MS-related pain. Cannabinoids were generally well-tolerated. However, cannabis use has been associated with an increased risk of psychosis and schizophrenia in at-risk individuals, there is growing evidence that cannabis can increase the risk for cardiovascular diseases, including myocardial infarction (MI), hypertension, heart failure, and stroke, and a recently recognized adverse effect of cannabis is cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome. The medical use of cannabinoids remains controversial. While cannabinoids have been studied for a variety of neurologic disorders, there is strongest evidence to indicate benefits in treatment of spasticity and neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis. Although the best dose for an individual remains uncertain, most participants in the studies discussed in this paper used between 20 and 40 mg of THC a day in divided doses. Adverse events in studies were generally more common in the groups using cannabinoid products but serious adverse events were rare and cannabis products were generally well-tolerated. Cannabis use does appear to be associated with increased risk of certain adverse events, including psychosis, cardiovascular diseases, and cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.