Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29922987›Full record

ArticleBehavior genetics2018

Indirect Genetic Effects for Growth in Pigs Affect Behaviour and Weight Around Weaning.

Irene Camerlink, Winanda W Ursinus, Andrea C Bartels, Piter Bijma, J Elizabeth Bolhuis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Towards assessing indirect genetic effects in dairy cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Irene CamerlinkAdaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Irene.camerlink@vetmeduni.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-3427-2210
Winanda W UrsinusAdaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Andrea C BartelsAdaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Piter BijmaAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
J Elizabeth BolhuisAdaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selection for indirect genetic effects (IGE), i.e. the genetic effect of an individual on a trait of another individual, is a promising avenue to increase trait values in plant and animal breeding. Studies in livestock suggest that selection for IGE for growth (IGEg) might increase animals' capacity to tolerate stress. We assessed the effect of a stressful phase (weaning) on the behaviour and performance of pigs (n = 480) divergently selected for high or low IGEg. High IGEg pigs were significantly slower to explore the feed and gained less weight than low IGEg pigs in the days after weaning. In line with previous findings, high IGEg animals may have prioritized the formation of social ranks.

Indexed as

WeaningAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBody WeightGrowth and DevelopmentSwineBreedingEnrichmentGenotype-by-environmentIndirect genetic effectsPigWeaning

Identifiers

PMID29922987
PMCPMC6097724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.