Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29922982›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2019

Codon Usage Pattern of Genes Involved in Central Nervous System.

Arif Uddin, Supriyo Chakraborty

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Analysis of codon usage patterns in open reading frame 4 of hepatitis E viruses.Beni-Suef University journal of basic and applied sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arif UddinDepartment of Zoology, Moinul Hoque Choudhury Memorial Science College, Algapur, Hailakandi, Assam, 788150, India. arif.uddin29@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5173-9812
Supriyo ChakrabortyDepartment of Biotechnology, Assam University, Silchar, Assam, 788011, India. supriyoch_2008@rediffmail.com.
Assam University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Codon usage bias (CUB) is the non-uniform usage of synonymous codons in which some codons are more preferred to others in the transcript. Analysis of codon usage bias has applications in understanding the basics of molecular biology, genetics, gene expression, and molecular evolution. To understand the patterns of codon usage in genes involved in the central nervous system (CNS), we used bioinformatic approaches to analyze the protein-coding sequences of genes involved in the CNS. The improved effective number of codons (ENC) suggested that the overall codon usage bias was low. The relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) revealed that the most frequently occurring codons had a G or C at the third codon position. The codons namely TCC, AGC, CTG, CAG, CGC, ATC, ACC, GTG, GCC, GGC, and CGG (average RSCU > 1.6) were over-represented. Both mutation pressure and natural selection might affect the codon usage pattern as evident from correspondence and parity plot analyses. The overall GC content (59.93) was higher than AT content, i.e., genes were GC-rich. The correlation of GC12 with GC3 suggested that mutation pressure might affect the codon usage pattern.

Indexed as

Base CompositionCodonMutationCentral Nervous SystemComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticHumansCodonCentral nervous systemCodon usage biasMutation pressureRSCU

Identifiers

PMID29922982
OpenAlexW2809334490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.