Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29922979›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2018

Complication rates by surgeon type after open treatment of distal radius fractures.

Jeremy Truntzer, Kevin Mertz, Sara Eppler, Kevin Li, Michael Gardner, Robin Kamal

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy TruntzerStanford University Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford, USA.
Kevin MertzStanford University Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford, USA.
Sara EpplerStanford University Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford, USA.
Kevin LiStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Michael GardnerStanford University Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford, USA.
Robin KamalStanford University Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford, USA. rnkamal@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3011-6712
Stanford University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn distal radius fracture repair, complications often lead to reoperation and increased cost. We examined the trends and complications in open reduction internal fixation of distal radius fractures across hand specialist and non-hand specialist surgeons.

methodsWe examined claims data from the Humana administrative claims database between 2007 and 2016. International Classification of Disease, 9th Edition and Current Procedural Terminology codes were searched related to distal radius fractures repaired by open reduction internal fixation. Patients were filtered based on initial treatment by a hand specialty or non-hand specialty surgeon. Complications were reported within 1 year of surgical treatment in the following distinct categories: non-union, malunion, extensor/flexor tendon repair, CRPS, infection. Descriptive statistics were reported.

resultsHand specialists accounted for 182 procedures compared with 7708 procedures by non-hand specialty orthopaedic or general surgeons. There was an increase in the total number of procedures performed by hand specialists across the years of study, with a higher percentage of intra-articular cases completed by hand specialists (80.7%) compared to non-hand specialists (70.1%). Overall, the complication rates of hand specialists (6.5%) were higher than that of non-specialists (4.7%).

conclusionsThe results of this study demonstrate a small difference in overall complications for open reduction internal fixation of distal radius fractures by hand specialists in comparison to non-specialists despite treating a higher percentage of intra-articular fractures. Future work controlling for factors unaccounted for in claims-based analyses, such as fracture complexity, patient comorbidities, and surgeon factors are needed. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHandHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrthopedic SurgeonsPostoperative ComplicationsRadius FracturesRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultComplicationsDistal radius fractureHand surgeryOpen reduction internal fixationOrthopaedic surgery

Identifiers

PMID29922979
OpenAlexW2808813854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.