Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29922970›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2018

Fecal Bacteriome and Mycobiome in Bats with Diverse Diets in South China.

Juan Li, Linmiao Li, Haiying Jiang, Lihong Yuan, Libiao Zhang, Jing-E Ma, Xiujuan Zhang, Minhua Cheng, Jinping Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The microbiome of bat guano: for what is this knowledge important?Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Functional potential of gut microbiota inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juan LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Science, Guangzhou, 510650, Guangdong, China.
Linmiao LiGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Applied Biological Resources, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangzhou, China.
Haiying JiangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Science, Guangzhou, 510650, Guangdong, China.
Lihong YuanGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Applied Biological Resources, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangzhou, China.
Libiao ZhangGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Applied Biological Resources, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangzhou, China.
Jing-E MaGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Applied Biological Resources, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangzhou, China.
Xiujuan ZhangGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Applied Biological Resources, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangzhou, China.
Minhua ChengWuhan Chopper Biology Co., Ltd, Wuhan, 430000, Hubei, China.
Jinping ChenGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Applied Biological Resources, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangzhou, China. chenjp@giabr.gd.cn.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNWuhan YZY Biopharma (China) · CN

Funding

Funds for Environment Construction and Capacity Building of GDAS' Research Platform 2016GDASPT-0107GDAS Special Project of Science and Technology Development 2017GDASCX-0107PlanningFunds of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province 2013B031500006PlanningFunds of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province 2016B070701016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bats can be divided into frugivory, nectarivory, insectivory, and sanguivory based on their diets, and are therefore ideal wild animal models to study the relationship between diets and intestinal microflora. Early studies of bat gut bacteria showed that the diversity and structure of intestinal bacterial communities in bats are closely related to dietary changes. Worthy of note, intestinal microbes are composed of bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and archaea. Although the number of gut fungi is much lower than that of gut bacteria, they also play an important role in maintaining the host homeostasis. However, there are still few reports on the relationship between the gut mycobiota and the dietary habits of the host. In addition, bats have also been shown to naturally transmit pathogenic viruses and bacteria through their feces and saliva, but fungal infections from bat are less studied. Here, we used high-throughput sequencing of bacterial 16S and eukaryotic 18S rRNA genes in the V4 and V9 regions to characterize fecal bacterial and fungal microbiota in phytophagous and insectivorous bats in South China. The results show that the gut microbiota in bats were dominated by bacterial phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Tenericutes and Bacteroidetes, and fungal phyla Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. There was a significant difference in the diversity of bacterial and fungal microbiota between the groups, in addition to specific bacteria and fungi populations on each of them. Of note, the number of fungi in the feces of herbivorous bats is relatively higher. Most of these fungi are foodborne and are also pathogens of humans and other animals. Thus, bats are natural carriers of fungal pathogens. The current study expands the understanding of the bat gut bacterial and fungal mycobiota and provides further insight into the transmission of fungal pathogens.

Indexed as

Animal FeedChiropteraMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaBiodiversityChinaFecesFemaleFungiHumansMaleMetagenomeMetagenomicsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID29922970
OpenAlexW2809488256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.