Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29922965›Full record

ArticleDer Radiologe2018

Machine learning: from radiomics to discovery and routine.

G Langs, S Röhrich, J Hofmanninger, F Prayer, J Pan, C Herold, H Prosch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Der Radiologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Radiomics in colorectal cancer patients.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Impact of the Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: What Do Students Think?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. A methodological framework for AI-assisted diagnosis of active aortitis using radiomic analysis of FDG PET-CT images: Initial analysis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  14. [Tobacco smoke-related diseases].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

G LangsDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Computational Imaging Research Lab, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. georg.langs@meduniwien.ac.at.
S Röhrich
J Hofmanninger
F Prayer
J Pan
C Herold
H Prosch

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 2714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning is rapidly gaining importance in radiology. It allows for the exploitation of patterns in imaging data and in patient records for a more accurate and precise quantification, diagnosis, and prognosis. Here, we outline the basics of machine learning relevant for radiology, and review the current state of the art, the limitations, and the challenges faced as these techniques become an important building block of precision medicine. Furthermore, we discuss the roles machine learning can play in clinical routine and research and predict how it might change the field of radiology.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRadiologyHumansPrecision MedicineArtificial intelligenceComputed tomographyDecision supportImagingInformatics

Identifiers

PMID29922965
PMCPMC6244522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.