ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2018
Molecular Diagnosis of Visceral Leishmaniasis.
Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring real-time PCR techniques for diagnosing leishmaniasis: key insights from a systematic review.Parasitology research · 2025Pooled it
- A novel pan-Leishmania loop-mediated isothermal amplification (Loopamp) assay for diagnosis of cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- qPCR as a Tool for the Diagnosis of Visceral and Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Acta parasitologica · 2025Pooled it
- Design, Conduct, Analysis, and Reporting of Therapeutic Efficacy Studies in Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Systematic Review of Published Reports, 2000-2021.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnosis of visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) protocols: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Parasites & vectors · 2022Pooled it
- Methodological Appraisal of Literature Concerning the Analysis of Genetic Variants or Protein Levels of Complement Components on Susceptibility to Infection by Trypanosomatids: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Pooled it
- The Geographical Distribution of Human Cutaneous and VisceralFrontiers in public health · 2021Pooled it
- Imported Visceral Leishmaniasis in Timiș County, Western Romania.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Design of a novel multi epitope antigen for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis using an immunoinformatics approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Specificity of Primers and Probes for Molecular Diagnosis ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Molecular diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis from blood samples using different genetic markers: A simple, sensitive and less invasive diagnostic approach.Practical laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The relationships amongInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Immunization with recombinant LiHyp1 protein plus adjuvant is protective against tegumentary leishmaniasis.Parasitology research · 2023Article
- Article
- Metabolomics analysis of visceral leishmaniasis based on urine of golden hamsters.Parasites & vectors · 2023Article
- Parasite Detection in Visceral Leishmaniasis Samples by Dye-Based qPCR Using New Gene Targets ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Article
- Identification of molecular mechanisms causing skin lesions of cutaneous leishmaniasis using weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA).Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), a deadly parasitic disease, is a major public health concern globally. Countries affected by VL have signed the London Declaration on Neglected Tropical Diseases and committed to eliminate VL as a public health problem by 2020. To achieve and sustain VL elimination, it will become progressively important not to miss any remaining cases in the community who can maintain transmission. This requires accurate identification of symptomatic and asymptomatic carriers using highly sensitive diagnostic tools at the primary health service setting. The rK39 rapid diagnostic test (RDT) is the most widely used tool and with its good sensitivity and specificity is the first choice for decentralized diagnosis of VL in endemic areas. However, this test cannot discriminate between current, subclinical, or past infections and is useless for diagnosis of relapses and as a prognostic (cure) test. Importantly, as the goal of elimination of VL as a public health problem is approaching, the number of people susceptible to infection will increase. Therefore, correct diagnosis using a highly sensitive diagnostic test is crucial for applying appropriate treatment and management of cases. Recent advances in molecular techniques have improved Leishmania detection and quantification, and therefore this technology has become increasingly relevant due to its possible application in a variety of clinical sample types. Most importantly, given current problems in identifying asymptomatic individuals because of poor correlation between the main methods of detection, molecular tests are valuable for VL elimination programs, especially to monitor changes in burden of infection in specific communities. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the available VL diagnostics and discusses the usefulness of molecular methods in the diagnosis, quantification, and species differentiation as well as their clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.