Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29922850›Full record

ReviewSurgical endoscopy2018

Safety of orogastric tubes in foregut and bariatric surgery.

Kulvir Nandra, Richard Ing

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Role of Real-Time Continuous High-Resolution Manometry During Bougie-Free Laparoscopic Hill Repair for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kulvir NandraDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1015 Walnut Street, Curtis Building, Suite 620, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. Kulvir.Nandra@jefferson.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5600-4006
Richard IngDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1015 Walnut Street, Curtis Building, Suite 620, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrogastric tubes have traditionally aided foregut procedures with sizing and organ protection. The rise of bariatric surgery has led to the creation of novel medical devices aimed at facilitating the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. While approved by the FDA, the long-term safety profile of these devices in the general population is often unknown. This review looks at complications associated with novel Orogastric Tubes compared to the traditional bougie.

methodsWe performed a review of the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for complications associated with the traditional bougie, Boehringer Labs ViSiGi 3D® and the Medtronic GastriSail™ since 2011. In addition, we looked for reported cases in the literature of complications with these devices.

resultsOverall complication rates reported in the MAUDE database varied in number and severity. The bougie had seven reported complications, one of which was an organ perforation. The ViSiGi 3D® had zero reported complications. The GastriSail™ had 36 total reported complications with 17 perforations. A literature review shows that rates of bougie complications are extremely rare with no case reports or reviews of complications from the novel orogastric tubes.

conclusionsThe complication rates between the traditional bougie and novel devices vary in number and severity, with the GastriSail™ having the highest reported complication rate. Despite rigorous testing for FDA approval, ongoing research into performance of new medical devices in the general population remains important.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryDevice ApprovalEquipment DesignHumansIntubation, GastrointestinalObesity, MorbidUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBougieGastriSailOrogastric tube complicationsSleeve gastrectomyViSiGi 3D

Identifiers

PMID29922850
PMCPMC6647458
OpenAlexW2809082411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.