Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29922676›Full record

ArticleInflammatory intestinal diseases2018

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Budesonide in Patients with Active Crohn's Disease in Japan: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Phase 3 Study.

Tadashi Yokoyama, Akihiko Ohta, Satoshi Motoya, Masakazu Takazoe, Toshitaka Yajima, Masataka Date, Masahiro Nii, Péter Nagy, Yasuo Suzuki, Toshifumi Hibi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammatory intestinal diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01514240 (A Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomised, Parallel-group, Phase III Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of D9421-C 9 mg Versus Mesalazine 3 g in Patients With Active Crohn's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01514240 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomised, Parallel-group, Phase III Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of D9421-C 9 mg Versus Mesalazine 3 g in Patients With Active Crohn's Disease (CD) in Japan

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2012 to 2014Enrolled123ConditionsCrohn's DiseaseArmsD9421-C capsule 3 mg, Mesalazine tablets
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Tadashi YokoyamaYokoyama Hospital for Gastroenterological Diseases, Nagoya, Japan.
Akihiko OhtaIEDA Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Satoshi MotoyaSapporo-Kosei General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Masakazu TakazoeTokyo Yamate Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshitaka YajimaAstraZeneca K.K., Osaka, Japan.
Masataka DateAstraZeneca K.K., Osaka, Japan.
Masahiro NiiAstraZeneca K.K., Osaka, Japan.
Péter NagyAstraZeneca R&D Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Yasuo SuzukiToho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan.
Toshifumi HibiKitasato Institute Hospital, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan.
AstraZeneca (Japan) · JPAstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEKitasato Institute Hospital · JPSapporo Kosei General Hospital · JPToho University · JPTokyo Yamate Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUS and European guidelines recommend budesonide for the treatment of mild-to-moderate active ileocolic Crohn's disease (CD). However, budesonide has not been approved, and mesalazine is widely used as first-line treatment in Japan. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of budesonide in patients with mild-to-moderate active CD in Japan.

methodsIn this phase 3 noninferiority study (NCT01514240), 112 patients with a baseline Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of 180-400 were randomized to budesonide or mesalazine for 8 weeks. Assessments included remission rate (CDAI score ≤150) at weeks 2, 4, and 8, change in CDAI score, health-related quality of life (measured using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [IBDQ]), and tolerability.

resultsThe remission rate at week 8 was numerically higher in the budesonide group (30.4%) than in the mesalazine group (25.0%), and the noninferiority of budesonide to mesalazine was shown. The mean total CDAI score decreased to a greater extent with budesonide than with mesalazine. Mean IBDQ scores improved from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 8, and 10 in both groups; improvements were numerically higher with budesonide than with mesalazine. No safety concerns were found.

conclusionBudesonide is comparably effective to mesalazine in the treatment of Japanese patients with mild-to-moderate active CD.

Indexed as

BudesonideCrohn's diseaseEfficacyJapanMesalazine

Identifiers

PMID29922676
PMCPMC5988115
OpenAlexW2770965273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.