Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29922641›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2018

Improvements in Heart Rate Variability, Baroreflex Sensitivity, and Sleep After Use of Closed-Loop Allostatic Neurotechnology by a Heterogeneous Cohort.

Hossam A Shaltout, Sung W Lee, Catherine L Tegeler, Joshua R Hirsch, Sean L Simpson, Lee Gerdes, Charles H Tegeler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. The U.S. POINTER neurovascular ancillary study: Study design and methods.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hossam A ShaltoutHypertension and Vascular Research Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Sung W LeeUniversity of Arizona School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Catherine L TegelerDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Joshua R HirschDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Sean L SimpsonDepartment of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Lee GerdesBrain State Technologies, LLC, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.
Charles H TegelerDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Wake Forest University · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Wake Forest Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG049638 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BAKER, LAURA D. · 2016 to 2020
$12.2M
Statistical Methods for Whole-Brain Connectivety NetworksK25EB012236 · NIBIB · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SIMPSON, SEAN L · 2012 to 2016
$796k
NIBIB NIH HHS K25 EB012236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart rate variability (HRV) is an indicator of dynamic adaptability of the autonomic nervous system. Few interventions target upstream, cerebral cortex components of the heart-brain system for autonomic management. We report changes in HRV and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), associated with use of a noninvasive, closed-loop, allostatic, computer-guided, acoustic stimulation neurotechnology.

methodsOver 5 years, 220 subjects with heterogeneous neurological, cardiovascular, and psychophysiological conditions consecutively enrolled in a naturalistic, single-arm study exploring clinical effects associated with use of the neurotechnology. Of those, 202 completed the study protocol and 160 had recordings adequate to analyze HRV and BRS. Mean age was 44.0 (SD 19.4), with 130 women. Participants received a mean of 16.1 (5.2) sessions, over 24.2 days (23.3), with 9.5 (3.8) actual intervention days. Sessions included real-time analysis of brain electrical activity and software algorithm-guided translation of selected frequencies into patterns of acoustic stimulation (audible tones of variable pitch and timing), to facilitate auto-calibration of neural oscillations. Outcomes including 10-min supine, at-rest recordings of blood pressure and heart rate, and inventories for insomnia (ISI) and depression (CES-D or BDI-II), were obtained at baseline and 15.3 (16.7) days after the last session.

resultsCompared to baseline, significant increases (all

conclusionThese findings indicate that use of a noninvasive, allostatic, closed-loop neurotechnology appears to have robust potential for public health efforts to support greater flexibility in autonomic cardiovascular regulation, through self-optimization of electrical activity at the level of the brain.

Indexed as

acoustic stimulationallostasisbaroreflex sensitivityclosed-loopheart rate variabilityHIRREMneural oscillationsneurotechnology

Identifiers

PMID29922641
PMCPMC5996903
OpenAlexW2800851087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.