ArticleBiomolecular detection and quantification2018
A PCR-based quantitative assay for the evaluation of mRNA integrity in rat samples.
Article in Biomolecular detection and quantification, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lipid Nanoparticle Surface Engineering with Heparosan Polysaccharides for Safe and Effective mRNA DeliveryACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Enzyme-enhanced RNA isolation from biofilm-producing bacteria.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Targeting and tracking mRNA lipid nanoparticles at the particle, transcript and protein level.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- An optimized QIAzol-based protocol for simultaneous miRNA, RNA, and protein isolation from precision-cut lung slices (PCLS).Respiratory research · 2024Article
- Integrity assay for messenger RNA in mouse and human brain samples and synaptosomal preparations.iScience · 2024Article
- Downregulation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- An optimized method for high-quality RNA extraction from distinctive intrinsic laryngeal muscles in the rat model.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Regulatory guidelines and preclinical tools to study the biodistribution of RNA therapeutics.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022Review
- Assessment of RNA extraction protocols from cladocerans.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- Evidence for increased thermogenesis in female C57BL/6J mice housed aboard the international space station.NPJ microgravity · 2021Article
- A rapid RNA extraction method from oil palm tissues suitable for reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR).3 Biotech · 2020Article
- Article
- Identification of an optimal method for extracting RNA from human skin biopsy, using domestic pig as a model system.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Enhancing the performance of an in vitro RNA biosensor through iterative design of experiments.Biotechnology progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reverse Transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) is applied to quantify gene transcript levels in a wide range of investigations. Proper assessment of RNA integrity is essential for reliable assessment of gene expression levels, as RNA molecules are acutely vulnerable to degradation. However, RNA quality control measures are still infrequently reported in rat toxicological studies, which impede proper evaluation of gene expression data reliability. The high operational cost of microfluidic capillary electrophoresis systems along with paucity of alternative methods for the quantitative assessment of rat RNA integrity constitute potential hurdles to the systematic implementation and reporting of RNA integrity assessment in rat studies. This manuscript describes the adaptation of an alternative RT-qPCR-based 3':5' assay as an additional option for the quantitative assessment of rat RNA integrity. Two PCR primer sets were designed on the 3' and 5' regions of a rat housekeeping gene to evaluate RNA integrity by measuring the relative expression (3':5' ratio) of these amplicons. The 3':5' ratios were then compared to Agilent Bioanalyzer's RNA integrity number (RIN) for a wide range of RNA samples originating from different tissues, cultured cell lines and rat strains that were prepared freshly, stored for years at -80 °C, purchased commercially or intentionally degraded. The 3':5' ratios and RIN values presented similar assessment of RNA integrity status from intact to heavily degraded samples. Based on the LOWESS regression of this large comparison dataset, 3':5' ratio threshold criteria equivalent to RIN cut-off values can be proposed for the selection of RNA samples for RT-qPCR analyses. This qPCR-based assay is easy to implement, cost-effective, and provides a reliable quantification of RNA integrity to assist in the selection of rat RNA samples suitable for downstream RT-qPCR gene expression analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.