Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29922477›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters2018

Using brain connectivity metrics from synchrostates to perform motor imagery classification in EEG-based BCI systems.

Lorena Santamaria, Christopher James

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lorena SantamariaInstitute of Digital Healthcare, Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Christopher JamesWarwick Engineering in Biomedicine, School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase synchronisation between different neural groups is considered an important source of information to understand the underlying mechanisms of brain cognition. This Letter investigated phase-synchronisation patterns from electroencephalogram (EEG) signals recorded from ten healthy participants performing motor imagery (MI) tasks using schematic emotional faces as stimuli. These phase-synchronised states, named synchrostates, are specific for each cognitive task performed by the user. The maximum and minimum number of occurrence states were selected for each subject and task to extract the connectivity network measures based on graph theory to feed a set of classification algorithms. Two MI tasks were successfully classified with the highest accuracy of 85% with corresponding sensitivity and specificity of 85%. In this work, not only the performance of different supervised learning techniques was studied, as well as the optimal subset of features to obtain the best discrimination rates. The robustness of this classification method for MI tasks indicates the possibility of expanding its use for online classification of the brain-computer interface (BCI) systems.

Indexed as

brain cognitionbrain-computer interfacesbrain-computer interface systemsbrain connectivity metricsclassihcation algorithmscognitioncognitive taskconnectivity networkdiscrimination ratesEEG-based BCI systemselectroencephalogram signalselectroencephalographyfeature extractiongraph theorylearning (artificial intelligence)medical signal processingMI tasksmotor imagery classificationmotor imagery tasksneural groupsneurophysiologyoccurrence statesonline classificationoptimal feature subsetphase-synchronisation patternsschematic emotional facessignal classificationsupervised learning techniquessynchronisation

Identifiers

PMID29922477
PMCPMC5998754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.